Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-303 (2026)

Rehabilitator - Duties and authority

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1991, ch. 142, § 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1996–2000 · leading case: State ex rel. McReynolds v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 921 S.W.2d 176 (Tenn. 1996).
State ex rel. McReynolds v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 921 S.W.2d 176 (Tenn. 1996). · cites it 2× “The designation of "receiver” rather than "re-habilitator,” see Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-303, or "liquidator,” see Tenn.”
State, ex rel v. Xantus (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 17× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-303 (c). What is the court’s role? The court must approve the petition for an order of rehabilitation.”
United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., by & through Douglas M. Sizemore, Comm'r of Com. & Ins. v. United Am. Bank of Memphis (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-303 (c) vests in a rehabilitator “all of the powers of the [insurance company’s] directors, officers, and managers,” but does not specifically empower a rehabilitator to avoid preferences.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-303(e) — 1 case
State, ex rel v. Xantus (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-303 (c). What is the court’s role? The court must approve the petition for an order of rehabilitation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.