Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-307 (2026)

Order of liquidation - Effect - Declaration of insolvency - Financial reports - Appeal pendency plan

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1991, ch. 142, § 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1996–2001 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 56 S.W.3d 557 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 56 S.W.3d 557 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-307(a). The order of liquidation also must provide for the termination of all the company’s outstanding policies.”
Bryant v. Shields, Britton & Fraser, 930 S.W.2d 836 (Tex. App. 1996). “2d at 794 ; see also Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-307(f)(l)-(3)(B) (1994) (contemplating appeals from final orders of liquidation by providing for appeal pendency plan for continued performance of insurer’s policy claims obligations).”
State ex rel. McReynolds v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 921 S.W.2d 176 (Tenn. 1996). · cites it 2× “The designation of "receiver” rather than "re-habilitator,” see Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-303, or "liquidator,” see Tenn.”
United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., by & through Douglas M. Sizemore, Comm'r of Com. & Ins. v. United Am. Bank of Memphis (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-307 (a) (1994). In order to minimize the company’s losses, the commissioner may (1) collect all -5- debts and moneys due and claims belonging to the company,4 (2) institute, continue, or abandon lawsuits or other legal proceedings involving the company,5…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-307(a) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 56 S.W.3d 557 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-307(a). The order of liquidation also must provide for the termination of all the company’s outstanding policies.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-307(f)(l) — 1 case
Bryant v. Shields, Britton & Fraser, 930 S.W.2d 836 (Tex. App. 1996). “2d at 794 ; see also Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-307(f)(l)-(3)(B) (1994) (contemplating appeals from final orders of liquidation by providing for appeal pendency plan for continued performance of insurer’s policy claims obligations).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.