Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-317 (2026)

Preferences - Definition - Avoidance by liquidator - When transfer is made or perfected - Liens - Jurisdiction of chancery court - Preferences in favor of attorneys or insiders of insurer - Federal home loan bank

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 430,s 6, eff. 5/21/2019.

Acts 1991, ch. 142, § 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1996–2003 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 56 S.W.3d 557 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 56 S.W.3d 557 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-311(a). 9 . Tenn.Code Ann.”
In Re Med. Care Mgmt. Co., 361 B.R. 863 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 2003). · cites it 2× “§ 56-9-315 (fraudulent transfer) and T.C.A. § 56-9-317 (preferential transfer).”
United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., by & through Douglas M. Sizemore, Comm'r of Com. & Ins. v. United Am. Bank of Memphis (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 59× “The bank moved to dismiss the commissioner’s petition because the challenged transfer occurred outside of the avoidance period in Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-317 (a)(2)(B) (1994).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-317(a) — 1 case
United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., by & through Douglas M. Sizemore, Comm'r of Com. & Ins. v. United Am. Bank of Memphis (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “The bank moved to dismiss the commissioner’s petition because the challenged transfer occurred outside of the avoidance period in Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-317 (a)(2)(B) (1994).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.