Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-402 (2026)

Application by commissioner to liquidate assets of foreign or alien insurer - Grounds - Notice to insurer - Issuance of order by court - Receiver - Payment of claims after liquidation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1991, ch. 142, § 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1998–2000 · leading case: Bryant v. United Shortline Inc. Assurance Servs., N.A., 972 S.W.2d 26 (Tex. 1998).
Bryant v. United Shortline Inc. Assurance Servs., N.A., 972 S.W.2d 26 (Tex. 1998). · cites it 2× “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-402(a) (1994). There is no dispute that Anchorage is a foreign insurer and that the assets involved in this case are outside the state of Tennessee.”
State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. Sur. Bank, 200 F.3d 373 (5th Cir. 2000). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-402(a) (1998)(emphasis added).”
Tennessee Ex Rel. Sizemore v. Sur. Bank, N.A., 84 F. Supp. 2d 803 (N.D. Tex. 1998). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-402(a) (“If no domiciliary receiver has been appointed, the commissioner may apply .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-402(a) — 3 cases
Bryant v. United Shortline Inc. Assurance Servs., N.A., 972 S.W.2d 26 (Tex. 1998). “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-402(a) (1994). There is no dispute that Anchorage is a foreign insurer and that the assets involved in this case are outside the state of Tennessee.”
State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. Sur. Bank, 200 F.3d 373 (5th Cir. 2000). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-402(a) (1998)(emphasis added).”
Tennessee Ex Rel. Sizemore v. Sur. Bank, N.A., 84 F. Supp. 2d 803 (N.D. Tex. 1998). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-402(a) (“If no domiciliary receiver has been appointed, the commissioner may apply .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-402(c) — 1 case
Bryant v. United Shortline Inc. Assurance Servs., N.A., 972 S.W.2d 26 (Tex. 1998). “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-402(a) (1994). There is no dispute that Anchorage is a foreign insurer and that the assets involved in this case are outside the state of Tennessee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.