Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 62-13-406 (2026)

Designated broker - Managing broker

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1995, ch. 246, § 8.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2006–2013 · leading case: Ingram v. Cendant Mobility Fin. Corp., 215 S.W.3d 367 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
Ingram v. Cendant Mobility Fin. Corp., 215 S.W.3d 367 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 5× “§ 62-13-406(c) (1997) (“There shall be no imputation of knowledge or information among or between clients, managing broker and any designated agent(s) in a designated agency situation”).”
Reid R. Crumpton v. Patricia G. Grissom (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 13× “– (a) A licensee entering into a written agreement to represent any party in the buying, selling, exchanging, renting or leasing of real estate may be appointed as the designated and individual agent of this party by the licensee’s managing broker, to the exclusion of all other…”
Raymond Konop v. James Henry (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 6× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 62-13-406 (b). David Jent’s duty to the purchasers was to ensure that Jason Jent complied with all appropriate laws, rules and regulations.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 62-13-406(c) — 1 case
Ingram v. Cendant Mobility Fin. Corp., 215 S.W.3d 367 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “§ 62-13-406(c) (1997) (“There shall be no imputation of knowledge or information among or between clients, managing broker and any designated agent(s) in a designated agency situation”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.