Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-22-106 (2026)

Postponement pending identification

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If the clerk or deputy clerk does not know, is not personally acquainted with, or does not have satisfactory evidence of a person wishing to make acknowledgment of the execution of an instrument, the clerk or deputy clerk shall file it, and note, on the record of the probate of deeds, the date of the presentation of the instrument, and the reason of the postponement of the acknowledgment; and then, within twenty (20) days, the party may produce witnesses before the clerk or deputy clerk, to prove the identity of the person so offering to acknowledge the same; and the deed, when acknowledged after such proof, shall take effect from the filing with the clerk.

(b) For purposes of this chapter, "know" or "personally acquainted with" means having an acquaintance, derived from association with the individual in relation to other people and based upon a chain of circumstances surrounding the individual, which establishes the individual's identity with at least reasonable certainty.

(c) For the purposes of this chapter, "satisfactory evidence" means the absence of any information, evidence, or other circumstances which would lead a reasonable person to believe that the person making the acknowledgment is not the individual such person claims to be and any one (1) of the following:
- (1) The oath or affirmation of a credible witness personally known to the officer that the person making the acknowledgment is personally known to the witness;
- (2) Reasonable reliance on the presentation to the officer of any one of the following, if the document is current or has been issued within five (5) years:
  - (A) An identification card or driver's license issued by the department of safety; or
  - (B) A passport issued by the United States department of state; or
- (3) Reasonable reliance on the presentation of any one (1) of the following, if the document is current or has been issued within five (5) years and contains a photograph and description of the person named on it, is signed by the person, bears a serial or other identifying number, and, in the event that the document is a passport, has been stamped by the United States immigration and naturalization service:
  - (A) A passport issued by a foreign government;
  - (B) A driver's license issued by a state other than this state;
  - (C) An identification card issued by a state other than this state; or
  - (D) An identification card issued by any branch of the armed forces of the United States.

(d) An officer who has taken an acknowledgment pursuant to this section shall be presumed to have operated in accordance with this chapter.

(e) Any party who files an action for damages based on the failure of the officer to establish the proper identity of the person making the acknowledgment shall have the burden of proof in establishing the negligence or misconduct of the officer.

Code 1858, § 2047 (deriv. Acts 1833, ch. 92, §§ 13, 14); Shan., §3722; Code 1932, § 7637; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 64-2206; Acts 1983, ch. 158, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2022 · leading case: In Re Akins, 87 S.W.3d 488 (Tenn. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Akins, 87 S.W.3d 488 (Tenn. 2002). · cites it 10× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-22-106. However, we hold that under Tennessee Code Annotated section 66-22-114(b) the text of an acknowledgment need not explicitly state that this function was performed.”

In Re Bushee, 319 B.R. 542 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2004). “§ 66-22-106. However, we hold that under Tennessee Code Annotated section 66-22-114(b) the text of an acknowledgment need not explicitly state that this function was performed.”

In Re: Ronald Lebron Akins, Sr. (Tenn. 2002). · cites it 10× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-22-106 . However, we hold that under Tennessee Code Annotated section 66-22-114(b) the text of an acknowledgment need not explicitly state that this function was performed.”

Fam. Trust Servs. LLC v. Green Wise Homes LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “10, 2004); see Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-22-106 . Notwithstanding, as this Court has declared, “the cases in Tennessee dealing with a notary’s duties generally find only a duty to make sure the person executing a document is the person he/she purports to be.”

Peltz v. Peltz (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “1 A notary is a public officer, and a presumption arises that notaries 1 Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-22-106 (c) contains a test to determine when a clerk or deputy clerk has satisfactory evidence that the person signin g an instrume nt is really the person w hose signature is used.”

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-22-106(c) — 2 cases

In Re Akins, 87 S.W.3d 488 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-22-106. However, we hold that under Tennessee Code Annotated section 66-22-114(b) the text of an acknowledgment need not explicitly state that this function was performed.”

In Re: Ronald Lebron Akins, Sr. (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-22-106 . However, we hold that under Tennessee Code Annotated section 66-22-114(b) the text of an acknowledgment need not explicitly state that this function was performed.”

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-22-106(d) — 2 cases

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-22-106(e) — 1 case

Fam. Trust Servs. LLC v. Green Wise Homes LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). “10, 2004); see Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-22-106 . Notwithstanding, as this Court has declared, “the cases in Tennessee dealing with a notary’s duties generally find only a duty to make sure the person executing a document is the person he/she purports to be.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.