Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-3-301 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of May 2026
This part may be cited as the "Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act."
Acts 2003, ch. 42, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1986–2025 · leading case: Edwards v. Edwards, 713 S.W.2d 642 (Tenn. 1986).
Edwards v. Edwards, 713 S.W.2d 642 (Tenn. 1986). “00) dollars; and (3) declaring certain conveyances between Henry Edwards and his second wife to be fraudulent conveyances in violation of T.C.A. § 66-3-301 through § 66-3-314. The administratrix petitioned the trial court to terminate the obligation to pay alimony by reason of…”
Paris v. Walker (In re Walker), 566 B.R. 503 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2017). “i Claims brought under the Tennessee Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 66-3-301 to -313 The Trustee contends there are two legal bases under Tennessee state law to support his claims under 11 U.”
Guinn v. Lines (In Re Trans-Lines West, Inc.), 203 B.R. 653 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996). “10, 1987). In discussing the breadth of the various state code provisions that have been patterned after this Act, the following has been noted: The terms of the fraudulent conveyance statutes are broad enough to include every transaction by which creditors or others may be…”
In Re Conservatorship of Groves, 109 S.W.3d 317 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “Because the State is a creditor, the Bureau of TennCare and the Commissioner of Health may invoke Tennessee’s fraudulent conveyance statutes to set conveyances aside if they were made for the purpose of qualifying the recipient for benefits. Pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann.”
Sanford v. Waugh & Co., Inc., 328 S.W.3d 836 (Tenn. 2010). “Sanford was able to successfully prosecute and obtain a judgment in this ease for those transfers made by SecureOne that the jury found to be fraudulent. Mr. Sanford admits in his appellate brief that “[ojfficers and directors are already prohibited from self-dealing and from…”
Se. Waffles, LLC v. United States Dep't of Treasury/Internal Revenue Serv. (In Re Se. Waffles, LLC), 460 B.R. 132 (6th Cir. BAP 2011). “§§ 548 and 550, as well as the Tennessee Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-3-301, et seq. For the reasons that follow, the Panel affirms the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing the Debtor’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).”
Se. Waffles, LLC v. United States Dep't of Treasury, 702 F.3d 850 (6th Cir. 2012). “§ 548 (a)(1)(B), and the Tennessee Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“TUFTA”), Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-3-301 et seq. We AFFIRM.”
Still v. Hopkins (In re Hopkins), 494 B.R. 306 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2013). “§ 544 and Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-3-301 et seq. Id. at ¶ 1.”
Weaver v. Nelms, 750 S.W.2d 158 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987). “§ 66-3-301 et seq.” Judgment was entered setting aside the assignment of the Grantham Note to Nancy Wilson as custodian for Stephanie McIntosh.”
Nippert v. Jackson, 860 F. Supp. 2d 554 (M.D. Tenn. 2012). “Section 66-3-305(a)(l) of the UFTA provides, in pertinent part, that “[a] transfer made .”
Billy F. Hawk, Jr., GST Non-Exempt Marital Trust v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 924 F.3d 821 (6th Cir. 2019). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-3-301 et seq . The Act treats a transfer as fraudulent "if the debtor made the transfer .”
Crocker v. Ryan, 914 S.W.2d 551 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). “We also think Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-3-305 refers to creditors in existence at the time the fraudulent conveyance is made.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-3-301(2) — 1 case
Guinn v. Lines (In Re Trans-Lines West, Inc.), 203 B.R. 653 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996). “10, 1987). In discussing the breadth of the various state code provisions that have been patterned after this Act, the following has been noted: The terms of the fraudulent conveyance statutes are broad enough to include every transaction by which creditors or others may be…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-3-301(3) — 2 cases
In Re Conservatorship of Groves, 109 S.W.3d 317 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “Because the State is a creditor, the Bureau of TennCare and the Commissioner of Health may invoke Tennessee’s fraudulent conveyance statutes to set conveyances aside if they were made for the purpose of qualifying the recipient for benefits. Pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann.”
Crocker v. Ryan, 914 S.W.2d 551 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). “We also think Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-3-305 refers to creditors in existence at the time the fraudulent conveyance is made.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.