Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-32-101 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of May 2026
This part shall be known and may be cited as the "Tennessee Time-Share Act of 1981."
Acts 1981, ch. 372, §§ 1, 35; T.C.A., § 64-3201; Acts 1983, ch. 210, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1987–2025 · leading case: Skinner v. Steele, 730 S.W.2d 335 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987).
Skinner v. Steele, 730 S.W.2d 335 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987). “) Time-Share Act, T.C.A. § 66-32-101 et seq. The defendants’ interpretation of the exemption would deprive consumers of a meaningful remedy in many situations.”
State v. Heath, 806 S.W.2d 535 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990). “1 On October 22, 1987 the state’s attorney general initiated this action against Robert Heath, the Heath Corporation, Tennessee State Bank and others for violations of the Tennessee Time-Share Act of 1981, Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-32-101 et seq., and the Tennessee Consumer…”
Westgate Smoky Mountains at Gatlinburg v. Burns Phillips, Comm'r, Tennessee Dep't of Labor & Workforce Dev., 426 S.W.3d 743 (Tenn. 2013). “at 514 (codified as amended at Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 66-32-101 to -312 (2004)).”
Shiels v. Orange Lake Country Club, Inc. (E.D. Tenn. 2019). “) Plaintiffs assert claims against Defendant for: (1) “intentional misrepresentation (fraud)/promissory fraud/fraudulent concealment/negligent misrepresentation”; (2) violation of the Tennessee Time-Share Act of 1981, Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-32-101 et seq.; (3) breach of contract;…”
Bauer v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. (TV1) (E.D. Tenn. 2021). “Plaintiffs brought this complaint1 containing several claims against defendants, including intentional misrepresentation, constructive fraud, breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent concealment, violations of the Tennessee Timeshare Act, T.C.A. §…”
Allen v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. (TV1) (E.D. Tenn. 2021). “Plaintiffs brought this complaint1 containing several claims against defendants, including intentional misrepresentation, constructive fraud, breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent concealment, in addition to violations of the Tennessee Timeshare Act,…”
Hamm v. Wyndham Resort Dev. Corp. (M.D. Tenn. 2019). “) Based on these factual allegations, the Complaint asserts causes of action for (1) fraud; (2) fraudulent misrepresentation; (3) fraudulent inducement; (4) misrepresentation by concealment; (5) negligent misrepresentation; (6) violation of the Tennessee Timeshare Act, Tenn.…”
Barbu v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. (M.D. Tenn. 2021). “18), substantially narrowing the focus of their factual allegations and limiting their legal claims to only two counts related to the 2012 timeshare agreement: (1) a claim for breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing (Count I); and (2) a claim for…”
Moore v. Westgate Resorts Ltd., L.P. (E.D. Tenn. 2025). “Plaintiffs bring claims against Defendants for violations of the Tennessee Time-Share Act of 1981, Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-32-101 et seq. (Counts I and II), unjust enrichment (Count III), fraudulent misrepresentation by omission (Count IV), fraud in the inducement (Count V),…”
Moore v. Westgate Resorts Ltd., L.P. (E.D. Tenn. 2025). “Plaintiffs bring claims against Defendants for violations of the Tennessee Time-Share Act of 1981, Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-32-101 et seq. (Counts I and II), unjust enrichment (Count III), fraudulent misrepresentation by omission (Count IV), fraud in the inducement (Count V),…”
Moore v. Westgate Resorts Ltd., L.P. (E.D. Tenn. 2025). “Plaintiffs bring claims against Defendants for violations of the Tennessee Time-Share Act of 1981, Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-32-101 et seq. (Counts I and II), unjust enrichment (Count III), fraudulent misrepresentation by omission (Count IV), fraud in the inducement (Count V),…”
John M. North v. Westgate Resorts, LTD., L.P. (2018). “, and the Tennessee Time-Share Act, Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-32-101 et seq. Settlement negotiations followed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.