Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (2026)

Retention of portion of contract price in escrow - Applicability - Mandatory compliance

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 749, s 17, eff. 7/1/2020.

Acts 1975, ch. 345, §§ 1-4; T.C.A., §§ 64-1148 -- 64-1151; Acts 1985, ch. 340, §§ 1, 2; 1986, ch. 551, § 9; 2007 , ch. 189, § 43; 2007 , ch. 201, §§ 1, 2; T.C.A. § 66-11-144; Acts 2008 , ch. 804, §§ 1, 2; 2010 , ch. 875, §§ 1, 2; 2012 , ch. 609, §§ 2-5.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2012–2024 · leading case: Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 12× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) (providing in relevant part that when an owner retains a portion of the contract price, “that retained amount shall be deposited in a separate, interest-bearing, escrow account with a third party .”
Summit Contracting Grp., Inc. v. Ashland Heights, LP, 187 F. Supp. 3d 893 (M.D. Tenn. 2016). · cites it 5× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) and (i). The Retainage Laws also provide that, in the event the party withholding retainage “fail[s] to deposit the funds into an escrow account as provided herein, such party shall be responsible for paying the owner of the retained funds an…”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 30× “M2019-00322-COA-R3-CV A subcontractor sought statutory penalties against a prime contractor based on the contractor’s failure to comply with the Prompt Pay Act’s requirement that any retainage withheld be deposited into an interest-bearing escrow account as set forth in Tenn.…”
Twin K Constr., Inc. v. UMA, Geotechnical Constr., Inc. (E.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 17× “Twin K further relates that the subcontractor’s interest in the retained funds is subject to the rights of the general contractor pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (b) and that Tenn.”
King Constr. Grp., Inc. v. Highlands Residential Servs. (2024). · cites it 12× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a), (c). HRS failed to do so.”
Aarene Contracting, LLC v. Krispy Kreme Doughnut (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 8× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a). At no time during the performance of this contract did Krispy Kreme comply with Tennessee law.”
Vic Davis Constr., Inc. v. Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 5× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a). Compliance is mandatory and cannot be waived by contract.”
Fed. Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Relyant Global LLC (E.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 5× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) (2017) (emphasis added).”
Twin K Constr., Inc. v. UMA, Geotechnical Constr., Inc. (E.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 4× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a). Establishing the escrow account “is mandatory, and shall not be waived by contract.”
Clarksville Towers, LLC v. John Straussberger (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (2015) (providing that if funds retained pursuant to a construction contract are not timely released, “the prime contractor or remote contractor, as applicable, may seek any remedy in a court of proper jurisdiction[.”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (2021). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a).13 The retained funds become the property of the contractor to whom the retainage is owed, subject to default or failure to complete the work.”
Com. Painting Co., Inc. v. The Weitz Co., LLC (Tenn. 2023). · cites it 2× “Commercial Painting contended that Weitz improperly supplemented Commercial Painting’s work by falsely claiming Commercial Painting was not completing its work according to a schedule that Weitz knew contained false 4 Transferred to section 66-34-104 of the Tennessee Code by…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104(a) — 3 cases
Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) (providing in relevant part that when an owner retains a portion of the contract price, “that retained amount shall be deposited in a separate, interest-bearing, escrow account with a third party .”
Aarene Contracting, LLC v. Krispy Kreme Doughnut (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a). At no time during the performance of this contract did Krispy Kreme comply with Tennessee law.”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “M2019-00322-COA-R3-CV A subcontractor sought statutory penalties against a prime contractor based on the contractor’s failure to comply with the Prompt Pay Act’s requirement that any retainage withheld be deposited into an interest-bearing escrow account as set forth in Tenn.…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104(c) — 5 cases
Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) (providing in relevant part that when an owner retains a portion of the contract price, “that retained amount shall be deposited in a separate, interest-bearing, escrow account with a third party .”
Summit Contracting Grp., Inc. v. Ashland Heights, LP, 187 F. Supp. 3d 893 (M.D. Tenn. 2016). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) and (i). The Retainage Laws also provide that, in the event the party withholding retainage “fail[s] to deposit the funds into an escrow account as provided herein, such party shall be responsible for paying the owner of the retained funds an…”
King Constr. Grp., Inc. v. Highlands Residential Servs. (2024). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a), (c). HRS failed to do so.”
Vic Davis Constr., Inc. v. Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a). Compliance is mandatory and cannot be waived by contract.”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “M2019-00322-COA-R3-CV A subcontractor sought statutory penalties against a prime contractor based on the contractor’s failure to comply with the Prompt Pay Act’s requirement that any retainage withheld be deposited into an interest-bearing escrow account as set forth in Tenn.…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104(d) — 1 case
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “M2019-00322-COA-R3-CV A subcontractor sought statutory penalties against a prime contractor based on the contractor’s failure to comply with the Prompt Pay Act’s requirement that any retainage withheld be deposited into an interest-bearing escrow account as set forth in Tenn.…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104(j) — 3 cases
Vic Davis Constr., Inc. v. Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a). Compliance is mandatory and cannot be waived by contract.”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “M2019-00322-COA-R3-CV A subcontractor sought statutory penalties against a prime contractor based on the contractor’s failure to comply with the Prompt Pay Act’s requirement that any retainage withheld be deposited into an interest-bearing escrow account as set forth in Tenn.…”
Fed. Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Relyant Global LLC (E.D. Tenn. 2022). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) (2017) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.