Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (2026)
Retention of portion of contract price in escrow - Applicability - Mandatory compliance
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) Whenever, in any contract for the improvement of real property, a certain amount or percentage of the contract price is retained, that retained amount must be deposited in a separate, interest-bearing, escrow account with a third party which must be established upon the withholding of any retainage.
- (b) As of the time of the withholding of the retained funds, the funds become the sole and separate property of the prime contractor or remote contractor to whom they are owed, subject to the rights of the person withholding the retainage in the event the prime contractor or remote contractor otherwise entitled to the funds defaults on or does not complete its contract.
- (c) If the party withholding the retained funds fails to deposit the funds into an escrow account as provided in this section, then the party shall pay the owner of the retained funds an additional three hundred dollars ($300) per day as damages, not as a penalty, for each and every day that the retained funds are not deposited into an escrow account. Damages accrue from the date retained funds were first withheld and continue to accrue until placed into a separate, interest-bearing escrow account or otherwise paid.
- (d) The party with the responsibility for depositing the retained amount in a separate, interest-bearing escrow account with a third party has the affirmative duty to provide written notice that the party has complied with this section to any prime contractor upon withholding the amount of retained funds from each and every application for payment, including:
- (1) Identification of the name of the financial institution with which the escrow account has been established;
- (2) Account number; and
- (3) Amount of retained funds that are deposited in the escrow account with the third party.
- (e) Upon satisfactory completion of the contract, to be evidenced by a written release by the owner, prime contractor, or remote contractor owing the retainage, all funds accumulated in the escrow account together with all interest on the account must be paid immediately to the prime contractor or remote contractor to whom the funds and interest are owed.
- (f) If the owner, prime contractor, or remote contractor, as applicable, fails or refuses to execute the release provided for in subsection (e), then the prime contractor or remote contractor, as applicable, may seek equitable relief, including injunctive relief, as provided in § 66-34-602, against the owner, prime contractor, or remote contractor. Relief may not be sought against the person holding the retainage as an escrow agent, and that person bears no liability for the nonpayment of the retainage; however, a court may issue an order to the person holding retainage to pay any sums held in trust pursuant to § 66-34-205. The person paying the sums pursuant to a court order bears no liability to the owner, prime contractor, or remote contractor for the payment. All other claims, demands, disputes, controversies, and differences that may arise between the owner, prime contractor, or prime contractors, and remote contractors may be, upon written agreement of all parties concerned, settled by arbitration conducted pursuant to the Uniform Arbitration Act, compiled in title 29, chapter 5, part 3, or the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.), as may be applicable.
- (g) Subsections (c), (d), and (j) do not apply to the state and any department, board, or agency thereof, including the University of Tennessee; counties and municipalities, and all departments, boards, or agencies thereof, including all school and education boards; and any other subdivision of the state.
- (h) This section applies to all prime contracts and all subcontracts thereunder for the improvement of real property when the contract amount of the prime contract is five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) or greater, notwithstanding the amount of the subcontracts.
- (i) Compliance with this section is mandatory, and shall not be waived by contract.
- (j) Failure to deposit the retained funds into an escrow account as provided in this section, within seven (7) days of receipt of written notice regarding the failure, is a Class A misdemeanor.
Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 749, s 17, eff. 7/1/2020.
Acts 1975, ch. 345, §§ 1-4; T.C.A., §§ 64-1148 -- 64-1151; Acts 1985, ch. 340, §§ 1, 2; 1986, ch. 551, § 9; 2007 , ch. 189, § 43; 2007 , ch. 201, §§ 1, 2; T.C.A. § 66-11-144; Acts 2008 , ch. 804, §§ 1, 2; 2010 , ch. 875, §§ 1, 2; 2012 , ch. 609, §§ 2-5.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2012–2024 · leading case: Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) (providing in relevant part that when an owner retains a portion of the contract price, “that retained amount shall be deposited in a separate, interest-bearing, escrow account with a third party .”
Summit Contracting Grp., Inc. v. Ashland Heights, LP, 187 F. Supp. 3d 893 (M.D. Tenn. 2016). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) and (i). The Retainage Laws also provide that, in the event the party withholding retainage “fail[s] to deposit the funds into an escrow account as provided herein, such party shall be responsible for paying the owner of the retained funds an…”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “M2019-00322-COA-R3-CV A subcontractor sought statutory penalties against a prime contractor based on the contractor’s failure to comply with the Prompt Pay Act’s requirement that any retainage withheld be deposited into an interest-bearing escrow account as set forth in Tenn.…”
Twin K Constr., Inc. v. UMA, Geotechnical Constr., Inc. (E.D. Tenn. 2022). “Twin K further relates that the subcontractor’s interest in the retained funds is subject to the rights of the general contractor pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (b) and that Tenn.”
King Constr. Grp., Inc. v. Highlands Residential Servs. (2024). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a), (c). HRS failed to do so.”
Aarene Contracting, LLC v. Krispy Kreme Doughnut (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a). At no time during the performance of this contract did Krispy Kreme comply with Tennessee law.”
Vic Davis Constr., Inc. v. Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a). Compliance is mandatory and cannot be waived by contract.”
Fed. Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Relyant Global LLC (E.D. Tenn. 2022). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) (2017) (emphasis added).”
Twin K Constr., Inc. v. UMA, Geotechnical Constr., Inc. (E.D. Tenn. 2022). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a). Establishing the escrow account “is mandatory, and shall not be waived by contract.”
Clarksville Towers, LLC v. John Straussberger (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (2015) (providing that if funds retained pursuant to a construction contract are not timely released, “the prime contractor or remote contractor, as applicable, may seek any remedy in a court of proper jurisdiction[.”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (2021). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a).13 The retained funds become the property of the contractor to whom the retainage is owed, subject to default or failure to complete the work.”
Com. Painting Co., Inc. v. The Weitz Co., LLC (Tenn. 2023). “Commercial Painting contended that Weitz improperly supplemented Commercial Painting’s work by falsely claiming Commercial Painting was not completing its work according to a schedule that Weitz knew contained false 4 Transferred to section 66-34-104 of the Tennessee Code by…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104(a) — 3 cases
Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) (providing in relevant part that when an owner retains a portion of the contract price, “that retained amount shall be deposited in a separate, interest-bearing, escrow account with a third party .”
Aarene Contracting, LLC v. Krispy Kreme Doughnut (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a). At no time during the performance of this contract did Krispy Kreme comply with Tennessee law.”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “M2019-00322-COA-R3-CV A subcontractor sought statutory penalties against a prime contractor based on the contractor’s failure to comply with the Prompt Pay Act’s requirement that any retainage withheld be deposited into an interest-bearing escrow account as set forth in Tenn.…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104(c) — 5 cases
Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) (providing in relevant part that when an owner retains a portion of the contract price, “that retained amount shall be deposited in a separate, interest-bearing, escrow account with a third party .”
Summit Contracting Grp., Inc. v. Ashland Heights, LP, 187 F. Supp. 3d 893 (M.D. Tenn. 2016). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) and (i). The Retainage Laws also provide that, in the event the party withholding retainage “fail[s] to deposit the funds into an escrow account as provided herein, such party shall be responsible for paying the owner of the retained funds an…”
King Constr. Grp., Inc. v. Highlands Residential Servs. (2024). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a), (c). HRS failed to do so.”
Vic Davis Constr., Inc. v. Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a). Compliance is mandatory and cannot be waived by contract.”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “M2019-00322-COA-R3-CV A subcontractor sought statutory penalties against a prime contractor based on the contractor’s failure to comply with the Prompt Pay Act’s requirement that any retainage withheld be deposited into an interest-bearing escrow account as set forth in Tenn.…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104(d) — 1 case
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “M2019-00322-COA-R3-CV A subcontractor sought statutory penalties against a prime contractor based on the contractor’s failure to comply with the Prompt Pay Act’s requirement that any retainage withheld be deposited into an interest-bearing escrow account as set forth in Tenn.…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104(j) — 3 cases
Vic Davis Constr., Inc. v. Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a). Compliance is mandatory and cannot be waived by contract.”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “M2019-00322-COA-R3-CV A subcontractor sought statutory penalties against a prime contractor based on the contractor’s failure to comply with the Prompt Pay Act’s requirement that any retainage withheld be deposited into an interest-bearing escrow account as set forth in Tenn.…”
Fed. Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Relyant Global LLC (E.D. Tenn. 2022). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-104 (a) (2017) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.