Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2111 (2026)

Apportionment of net worth

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 950,s 9, eff. 5/10/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 950,s 8, eff. 5/10/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 950,s 7, eff. 5/10/2024.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 377, s 25, eff. 5/11/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 377, s 24, eff. 5/11/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 377, s 23, eff. 5/11/2023.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 656, s 2, eff. 4/9/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 181, s 29, eff. 4/26/2017.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 514, s 17, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 514, Secs.s 16, s 16 eff. 5/20/2015.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 321, s 6, eff. 5/13/2013.

Acts 1999, ch. 406, § 4; 2000, ch. 982, §§ 35 - 37, 52; 2004, ch. 932, §§ 7 - 9; 2006, ch. 1019, § 20; 2010 , ch. 1134, §§ 15-17; 2011 , ch. 467, §§ 3, 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2009–2019 · leading case: Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee, 486 S.W.3d 496 (Tenn. 2016).
Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee, 486 S.W.3d 496 (Tenn. 2016). · cites it 5× “24 Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2111 -- Franchise Tax Apportionment Formula: (a)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this part, for tax years beginning prior to July 1, 2016, the net worth of a taxpayer doing business both in and outside this state shall be apportioned to this state by…”
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 67-4-2012® and § 67-4-2111®. It is understood and agreed that, from time to time, BAPCO does sell some books which are sales of tangible personal property and which are properly included in the numerator of the receipts factor.”
Comcast Holdings Corp. v. Tennessee Dep't of Revenue (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 3× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2111 (2008). The Parties agree on the amount at issue, depending upon where the earnings producing activity was performed as found by the trial court and now this court.”
Vodafone Americas Holdings Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “The Franchise Tax Apportionment Formula The statutory formula for apportionment of a multi-state company’s franchise tax is set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2111 (a): Except as may otherwise be provided in this part, the net worth of a taxpayer doing business both in and…”
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Loren L. Chumley, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 67-4-2012(i) and § 67-4-2111(i). It is understood and agreed that, from time to time, BAPCO does sell some books which are sales of tangible personal property and which are properly included in the numerator of the receipts factor.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2111(i) — 2 cases
Comcast Holdings Corp. v. Tennessee Dep't of Revenue (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2111 (2008). The Parties agree on the amount at issue, depending upon where the earnings producing activity was performed as found by the trial court and now this court.”
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Loren L. Chumley, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 67-4-2012(i) and § 67-4-2111(i). It is understood and agreed that, from time to time, BAPCO does sell some books which are sales of tangible personal property and which are properly included in the numerator of the receipts factor.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.