Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-2401 (2026)

Notice of intent to file suit - Publication

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 353, s 2, eff. 5/13/2013.

Acts 1923, ch. 77, § 6; Shan. Supp., §§ 913b12, 913b13; Code 1932, §§ 1586, 1587; Acts 1982, ch. 612, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 67-2001; Acts 1984, ch. 589, § 1; 2009 , ch. 185, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2005–2024 · leading case: State of Tennessee for the use & benefit of Williamson Cnty. v. Jesus Christ's Church @ Liberty Church Road (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
State of Tennessee for the use & benefit of Williamson Cnty. v. Jesus Christ's Church @ Liberty Church Road (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “Statement of the Case Suit was instituted pursuant to the provisions of Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-2401 , et seq., to recover delinquent ad valorem property taxes.”
Beneficial Tennessee, Inc. v. The Metro. Gov't (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Beneficial does not dispute that the county property taxes on the subject property were delinquent and that the Metro Trustee proceeded properly under Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-2401 et seq. to sell the property in order to collect the taxes.”
State ex rel. Walter J. Davis v. ABC Brentwood Locksmith Serv. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “The suit was brought pursuant to the provisions of Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-5-2401 et seq. for the collection of delinquent taxes due to Williamson County and the city of Franklin along with other taxes and other entities not involved in the issues at bar.”
Crockett Cnty. v. Farhad Motamedi v. Michael Moore (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024). “However, he argues that the trial court should have extended the limitations period, pursuant to § 67-5-2401(d)(2), because his actions in bringing the delinquent taxes up to date in August 2021 sufficed to meet the due diligence requirement for extending the limitations period.”
Bill Travis v. Trs. of Lakewood Park v. Coffee Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 67-5-2401 et seq., the County asserted liens and initiated sales of these lots to collect the delinquent taxes.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-2401(d)(2) — 1 case
Crockett Cnty. v. Farhad Motamedi v. Michael Moore (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024). “However, he argues that the trial court should have extended the limitations period, pursuant to § 67-5-2401(d)(2), because his actions in bringing the delinquent taxes up to date in August 2021 sufficed to meet the due diligence requirement for extending the limitations period.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.