Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-105 (2026)

Duties and authority of the board

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 548, s 1, eff. 5/26/2021.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 263, s 1, eff. 4/28/2021.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 181, s 13, eff. 7/1/2013.

Acts 1971, ch. 164, § 5; 1977, ch. 366, § 1; T.C.A., § 70-328(a); Acts 1984, ch. 804, § 3; 1988, ch. 688, §§ 4, 8; 1991, ch. 123, §1; 1992, ch. 693, § 1; 1998, ch. 643, § 1; 2005, ch. 355, §1; 2007 , ch. 362, §36; 2009 , ch. 271, §2; 2009 , ch. 464, § 3.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2024 · leading case: E. Ron Pickard v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd., 424 S.W.3d 511 (Tenn. 2013).
E. Ron Pickard v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd., 424 S.W.3d 511 (Tenn. 2013). · cites it 60× “After the Board scheduled a contested case hearing, an administrative law judge dismissed the request for a declaratory order on the ground that Tenn.Code Ann. § 69-3-105® (2012) provides the exclusive procedure to obtain administrative review of TDEC’s decision to issue the…”
State v. Champion Int'l Corp., 709 S.W.2d 569 (Tenn. 1986). · cites it 4× “T.C.A. § 69-3-105(h)(1) states: "The board shall have and exercise the power, duty, and responsibility to adopt, modify, repeal, and promulgate all necessary rules and regulations for the purpose of establishing and administering a comprehensive permit program that will enable…”
E. Ron Pickard & Linda Pickard, as Trs. of the Sharon Charitable Trust & as Individuals v. Tennessee Dep't of Env't & Conservation, Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd. & Tennessee Materials Corp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 24× “In addition, 10 The Board does state in its reply brief that the issues raised by the Appellees in this case fall squarely within the ambit of Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-105 (i) insofar as it allows a permit appeal .”
E. Ron Pickard v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd. - REHEAR (Tenn. 2014). · cites it 18× “To the contrary, we emphasized the language in Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-105 (i) that “[t]he permit appeal to the Board authorized by Tenn.”
City of Cookeville, Tennessee v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 6× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-105 (a)(1) (2003).”
E. Ron Pickard & Linda Pickard, as Trs. of the Sharon Charitable Trust & as Individuals v. Tennessee Dep't of Env't & Conservation, Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd. & Tennessee Materials Corp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 4× “This construction is based on: (1) the flexible and expansive text of section 69-3-105(i) that “any of the issues” raised during the permitting process “may” be presented in the appeal; (2) the need to assure that the right of an aggrieved party to obtain a ruling as a matter of…”
Sierra Club v. Tenn. Dep't of Env't (6th Cir. 2024). “Although the parties don’t mention it, a Tennessee regulation apparently requires petitioners to direct their appeal of TDEC’s order to Tennessee’s Board of Water Quality, Oil, and Gas “pursuant to T.C.A. § 69-3-105(i) and § 69-3-110” within 30 days after public notice of the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-105(h)(1) — 1 case
State v. Champion Int'l Corp., 709 S.W.2d 569 (Tenn. 1986). “T.C.A. § 69-3-105(h)(1) states: "The board shall have and exercise the power, duty, and responsibility to adopt, modify, repeal, and promulgate all necessary rules and regulations for the purpose of establishing and administering a comprehensive permit program that will enable…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-105(h)(l) — 1 case
State v. Champion Int'l Corp., 709 S.W.2d 569 (Tenn. 1986). “T.C.A. § 69-3-105(h)(1) states: "The board shall have and exercise the power, duty, and responsibility to adopt, modify, repeal, and promulgate all necessary rules and regulations for the purpose of establishing and administering a comprehensive permit program that will enable…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-105(i) — 4 cases
E. Ron Pickard v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd., 424 S.W.3d 511 (Tenn. 2013). “After the Board scheduled a contested case hearing, an administrative law judge dismissed the request for a declaratory order on the ground that Tenn.Code Ann. § 69-3-105® (2012) provides the exclusive procedure to obtain administrative review of TDEC’s decision to issue the…”
E. Ron Pickard & Linda Pickard, as Trs. of the Sharon Charitable Trust & as Individuals v. Tennessee Dep't of Env't & Conservation, Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd. & Tennessee Materials Corp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “In addition, 10 The Board does state in its reply brief that the issues raised by the Appellees in this case fall squarely within the ambit of Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-105 (i) insofar as it allows a permit appeal .”
E. Ron Pickard & Linda Pickard, as Trs. of the Sharon Charitable Trust & as Individuals v. Tennessee Dep't of Env't & Conservation, Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd. & Tennessee Materials Corp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “This construction is based on: (1) the flexible and expansive text of section 69-3-105(i) that “any of the issues” raised during the permitting process “may” be presented in the appeal; (2) the need to assure that the right of an aggrieved party to obtain a ruling as a matter of…”
Sierra Club v. Tenn. Dep't of Env't (6th Cir. 2024). “Although the parties don’t mention it, a Tennessee regulation apparently requires petitioners to direct their appeal of TDEC’s order to Tennessee’s Board of Water Quality, Oil, and Gas “pursuant to T.C.A. § 69-3-105(i) and § 69-3-110” within 30 days after public notice of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.