Tex. Codes » Family Code · TITLE 5. THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP AND THE SUIT AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · SUBTITLE B. SUITS AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · CHAPTER 152. UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT
Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 152.202 (2026)

Exclusive Continuing Jurisdiction

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 152.202. EXCLUSIVE CONTINUING JURISDICTION. (a) Except as otherwise provided in Section 152.204, a court of this state which has made a child custody determination consistent with Section 152.201 or 152.203 has exclusive continuing jurisdiction over the determination until:

(1) a court of this state determines that neither the child, nor the child and one parent, nor the child and a person acting as a parent, have a significant connection with this state and that substantial evidence is no longer available in this state concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships; or

(2) a court of this state or a court of another state determines that the child, the child's parents, and any person acting as a parent do not presently reside in this state.

(b) A court of this state which has made a child custody determination and does not have exclusive, continuing jurisdiction under this section may modify that determination only if it has jurisdiction to make an initial determination under Section 152.201.

Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 34, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 84 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 2002–2024 · leading case: In re Forlenza, 140 S.W.3d 373 (Tex. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Forlenza, 140 S.W.3d 373 (Tex. 2004). · cites it 3× “During a pretrial conference seven days before the scheduled trial date, Robert filed a second motion to dismiss alleging that the court did not have exclusive continuing jurisdiction under Texas Family Code section 152.202(a) to modify its previous child-custody order.”
In re Lewin, 149 S.W.3d 727 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004). · cites it 5× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 152.202 (West 2002).”
In the Interest of Bellamy, 67 S.W.3d 482 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002). · cites it 6× “However, we find Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 152.202 (Vernon Supp.”
In re Tieri, 283 S.W.3d 889 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2008). · cites it 4× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 152.202 (Vernon 2002); see also N.”
George v. Jeppeson, 238 S.W.3d 463 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007). · cites it 2× “See Tex Fam.Code Ann. §§ 152.202, 155.001-.003 (Vernon 2002) (governing continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over child-custody matters by court rendering initial decree).”
In re Edith Garcia-Macklin Isquierdo, 426 S.W.3d 128 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2012). · cites it 4× “Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 152.202 (a)(2). Therefore, we must determine whether the trial court properly applied section 152.”
B.L. v. T.B., 152 A.3d 1014 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “§ 5422; Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §§ 152.202 . The UCCJEA contains a provision govern *1017 ing jurisdiction to modify custody orders.”
In re Dean, 393 S.W.3d 741 (Tex. 2012). “Because New Mexico, not Texas, is the child’s home state, and because we find no other “exclusive, continuing jurisdie *744 tion[al]” bases under the Act, see Tex. Fam.Code § 152.202, the Texas court improperly assumed jurisdiction.”
In re Meekins, 550 S.W.3d 729 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018). · cites it 2× “TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 152.202 (West 2014).”
Saavedra v. Schmidt, 96 S.W.3d 533 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 152.202. “Initial child custody determination” refers to the first child custody order concerning a particular child.”
in the Interest of T.B. & A.B., Child., 497 S.W.3d 640 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2016). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §§ 152.202 , .207 (West 2014).”
In the Interest of C.R.-A.A., 521 S.W.3d 893 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2017). “§ 551-202 with Tex Fam. Code Ann. § 152.202(a). . The definition of “child custody determination” in section 152.”
Show all 84 citing cases →
Tex. Fam. Code § 152.202(3): 2 cases
In the Interest of S.J.A., 272 S.W.3d 678 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008).
In re Sja, 272 S.W.3d 678 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008).
Tex. Fam. Code § 152.202(a): 16 cases
In re Forlenza, 140 S.W.3d 373 (Tex. 2004). “During a pretrial conference seven days before the scheduled trial date, Robert filed a second motion to dismiss alleging that the court did not have exclusive continuing jurisdiction under Texas Family Code section 152.202(a) to modify its previous child-custody order.”
In re Edith Garcia-Macklin Isquierdo, 426 S.W.3d 128 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2012). “Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 152.202 (a)(2). Therefore, we must determine whether the trial court properly applied section 152.”
In the Interest of C.R.-A.A., 521 S.W.3d 893 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2017). “§ 551-202 with Tex Fam. Code Ann. § 152.202(a). . The definition of “child custody determination” in section 152.”
In re Lewin, 149 S.W.3d 727 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 152.202 (West 2002).”
In the Interest of Bellamy, 67 S.W.3d 482 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002). “However, we find Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 152.202 (Vernon Supp.”
Tex. Fam. Code § 152.202(a)(1): 14 cases
In the Interest of Bellamy, 67 S.W.3d 482 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002). “However, we find Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 152.202 (Vernon Supp.”
In re Forlenza, 140 S.W.3d 373 (Tex. 2004). “During a pretrial conference seven days before the scheduled trial date, Robert filed a second motion to dismiss alleging that the court did not have exclusive continuing jurisdiction under Texas Family Code section 152.202(a) to modify its previous child-custody order.”
In re Meekins, 550 S.W.3d 729 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018). “TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 152.202 (West 2014).”
In re Tieri, 283 S.W.3d 889 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2008). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 152.202 (Vernon 2002); see also N.”
in the Interest of N.T.P. & L.C.P., Child., 402 S.W.3d 13 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012).
Tex. Fam. Code § 152.202(a)(2): 2 cases
In re Tieri, 283 S.W.3d 889 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2008). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 152.202 (Vernon 2002); see also N.”
Sherry Rhodes & Breena Rhodes, Both v. Andrew Aikens, No. 05-19-00047-CV (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 13, 2019).
Tex. Fam. Code § 152.202(b): 1 case
In re Lewin, 149 S.W.3d 727 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 152.202 (West 2002).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.