Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 156.105 (2026)

Modification Of Order Based On Military Duty

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 156.105. MODIFICATION OF ORDER BASED ON MILITARY DUTY. The military duty of a conservator who is ordered to military deployment, military mobilization, or temporary military duty, as those terms are defined by Section 153.701, does not by itself constitute a material and substantial change of circumstances sufficient to justify a modification of an existing court order or portion of a decree that sets the terms and conditions for the possession of or access to a child except that the court may render a temporary order under Subchapter L, Chapter 153.

Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 916 (H.B. 260), Sec. 18, eff. June 18, 2005.

Amended by:

Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 972 (S.B. 228), Sec. 14, eff. September 1, 2007.

Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1041 (H.B. 1864), Sec. 5, eff. June 15, 2007.

Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 727 (S.B. 279), Sec. 5, eff. September 1, 2009.

Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1113 (H.B. 1012), Sec. 30, eff. September 1, 2009.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1998–2002 · leading case: Bates v. Tesar, 81 S.W.3d 411 (Tex. App. 2002).
Bates v. Tesar, 81 S.W.3d 411 (Tex. App. 2002). “TEX.FAM.CODE ANN. § 156.105(a). Although this provision was in effect on the date the trial court entered its order, it was repealed in 2001.”
Jacobs v. Dobrei, 991 S.W.2d 462 (Tex. App. 1999). “” Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 156.105 (a) (Vernon 1996).”
Rayburn v. Rayburn, 979 S.W.2d 858 (Tex. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 156.105 (Vernon 1996).”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 156.105(a) — 2 cases
Bates v. Tesar, 81 S.W.3d 411 (Tex. App. 2002). “TEX.FAM.CODE ANN. § 156.105(a). Although this provision was in effect on the date the trial court entered its order, it was repealed in 2001.”
Rayburn v. Rayburn, 979 S.W.2d 858 (Tex. App. 1998). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 156.105 (Vernon 1996).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.