Tex. Codes » Family Code · TITLE 5. THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP AND THE SUIT AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · SUBTITLE B. SUITS AFFECTING THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP · CHAPTER 162. ADOPTION
Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 162.012 (2026)

Direct Or Collateral Attack

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 162.012. DIRECT OR COLLATERAL ATTACK. (a) Notwithstanding Rule 329, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the validity of an adoption order is not subject to attack after six months after the date the order was signed.

(b) The validity of a final adoption order is not subject to attack because a health, social, educational, and genetic history was not filed.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 601, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 600, Sec. 2, eff. Jan. 1, 1998.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2001–2026 · leading case: Goodson v. Castellanos, 214 S.W.3d 741 (Tex. App. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Goodson v. Castellanos, 214 S.W.3d 741 (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.012 (West 2002).”
Brackeen v. Zinke, 338 F. Supp. 3d 514 (N.D. Tex. 2018). “TEX. FAM. CODE § 162.012(a) (up to six months); Goodson v.”
In Re Smith, 262 S.W.3d 463 (Tex. App. 2008). “The court further held that Goodson could not attack the adoption order, because section 162.012 of the Family Code expressly prohibits an attack on the validity of an adoption order “after six months after the date the order was signed.”
Queen v. Goeddertz, 48 S.W.3d 928 (Tex. App. 2001). “Laws 2218 (current version at Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 162.012 (Vernon Supp.”
in the Interest of C.R.P., a Child, 192 S.W.3d 823 (Tex. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.012(a). Crystal contends that the affidavit was executed unknowingly and involuntarily, and thus, it was void, which amounts to an assertion of fraud, duress, or coercion.”
Jerry L. Berwick v. Richard T. Wagner, 509 S.W.3d 411 (Tex. App. 2014). “”); Texas Fam.Code Ann. § 162.012 (“[T]he validity of an adoption order' is not subject to attack after six months after the date the order was signed.”
in the Interest of K.B.S., 172 S.W.3d 152 (Tex. App. 2005). “Laws 113 , 220 (current version at Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.012 (Vernon 2002)).”
In the Interest of E.R., 335 S.W.3d 816 (Tex. App. 2011). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.012(a) (West 2008).”
In Re Crp, 192 S.W.3d 823 (Tex. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 162.012(a). Crystal contends that the affidavit was executed unknowingly and involuntarily, and thus, it was void, which amounts to an assertion of fraud, duress, or coercion.”
In Re Kbs, 172 S.W.3d 152 (Tex. App. 2005). “Laws 113 , 220 (current version at Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.012 (Vernon 2002)).”
In Re Er, 335 S.W.3d 816 (Tex. App. 2011). “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 162.012(a) (West 2008).”
Elizabeth Goodson v. Adelina Castellanos (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 162.012 (West 2002).”
Show all 18 citing cases →
— Tex. Fam. Code § 162.012(a) — 6 cases
Brackeen v. Zinke, 338 F. Supp. 3d 514 (N.D. Tex. 2018). “TEX. FAM. CODE § 162.012(a) (up to six months); Goodson v.”
in the Interest of C.R.P., a Child, 192 S.W.3d 823 (Tex. App. 2006). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.012(a). Crystal contends that the affidavit was executed unknowingly and involuntarily, and thus, it was void, which amounts to an assertion of fraud, duress, or coercion.”
In the Interest of E.R., 335 S.W.3d 816 (Tex. App. 2011). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.012(a) (West 2008).”
In Re Crp, 192 S.W.3d 823 (Tex. App. 2006). “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 162.012(a). Crystal contends that the affidavit was executed unknowingly and involuntarily, and thus, it was void, which amounts to an assertion of fraud, duress, or coercion.”
In Re Er, 335 S.W.3d 816 (Tex. App. 2011). “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 162.012(a) (West 2008).”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 162.012(b) — 1 case
in the Interest of H.L.S. & W.A.S., Child. (Tex. App. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.