Tex. Fin. Code § 1.001

Purpose Of Code

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 1.001. PURPOSE OF CODE. (a) This code is enacted as a part of the state's continuing statutory revision program, begun by the Texas Legislative Council in 1963 as directed by the legislature in the law codified as Section 323.007, Government Code. The program contemplates a topic-by-topic revision of the state's general and permanent statute law without substantive change.

(b) Consistent with the objectives of the statutory revision program, the purpose of this code is to make the law encompassed by this code more accessible and understandable by:

(1) rearranging the statutes into a more logical order;

(2) employing a format and numbering system designed to facilitate citation of the law and to accommodate future expansion of the law;

(3) eliminating repealed, duplicative, unconstitutional, expired, executed, and other ineffective provisions; and

(4) restating the law in modern American English to the greatest extent possible.

Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1008, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 11 cases, 1998–2001 · leading case: Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc. (1998) tex · cites it 2× “TEX. FIN. CODE § 1.001(a); Act of May 24, 1997, 75 th Leg.”

Ford v. City State Bank of Palacios (2001) texapp · cites it 2× “Tex.Fin.Code Ann. § 1.001(a); Act of May 24, 1997, 75th Leg.”

Pegasus Energy Group, Inc. v. Cheyenne Petroleum Co. (1999) texapp “Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 1.001 (a); Act of May 24, 1997, 75th Leg.”

Olympia Marble & Granite v. Mayes (2000) texapp “Tex. Fin. Code § 1.001(a); Act of May 24, 1997, 75th Leg.”

Anderson v. Chainani (In Re Kemper) (2001) txeb “Tex Fin.Code Ann. § 1.001 (a); Pegasus Energy Group, Inc.”

C&H Nationwide, Inc. v. Norwest Bank Texas NA (2000) ca5 “§ 1 (stating that the purpose of the Finance Code adopted by chapter 1008 of the 1997 Session Law was, in part, to revise “the state’s general and permanent statute law without substantive change”) (codified at Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 1.001 (West 1998)). Indeed, section 31.”

Ford, Gary C. v. the City State Bank of Palacios and J. Don Landry (2001) texapp · cites it 2× “Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 1.001 (a); Act of May 24, 1997, 75th Leg.”

Cluster 20724 “§ 1 (stating that the purpose of the Finance Code adopted by chapter 1008 of the 1997 Session Law was, in part, to revise “the state’s general and permanent statute law without substantive change”) (codified at TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 1.001 (West 1998)).”

C & H Nationwide Inc v. Norwest Bank Texas (2000) ca5 “§ 1 (stating that the purpose of the Finance Code adopted by chapter 1008 of the 1997 Session Law was, in part, to revise “the state’s general and permanent statute law without substantive change”) (codified at TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 1.001 (West 1998)).”

Rodney Elkins v. State (2000) texapp “See Tex. Fin. Code Ann. §1.001 (West 1998). Because the three interest rates now charged to Elkins were specifically set forth in the notes he signed, the post-judgment interest award incorporating these three interest rates is not ambiguous or vague.”

Stone, Jack L. v. King, Thomas E. (2000) texapp “Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 1.001 (a); Act of May 24, 1997, 75th Leg.”

— Tex. Fin. Code § 1.001(a) — 3 cases

Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc. (1998) tex “TEX. FIN. CODE § 1.001(a); Act of May 24, 1997, 75 th Leg.”

Ford v. City State Bank of Palacios (2001) texapp “Tex.Fin.Code Ann. § 1.001(a); Act of May 24, 1997, 75th Leg.”

Olympia Marble & Granite v. Mayes (2000) texapp “Tex. Fin. Code § 1.001(a); Act of May 24, 1997, 75th Leg.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.