Sec. 1.001. PURPOSE OF CODE. (a) This code is enacted as a part of the state's continuing statutory revision program, begun by the Texas Legislative Council in 1963 as directed by the legislature in the law codified as Section 323.007, Government Code. The program contemplates a topic-by-topic revision of the state's general and permanent statute law without substantive change.
(b) Consistent with the objectives of the statutory revision program, the purpose of this code is to make the law encompassed by this code more accessible and understandable by:
(1) rearranging the statutes into a more logical order;
(2) employing a format and numbering system designed to facilitate citation of the law and to accommodate future expansion of the law;
(3) eliminating repealed, duplicative, unconstitutional, expired, executed, and other ineffective provisions; and
(4) restating the law in modern American English to the greatest extent possible.
Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1008, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Notes of Decisions
C&H Nationwide, Inc. v. Norwest Bank Texas NA, 208 F.3d 490 (5th Cir. 2000).
“§ 1 (stating that the purpose of the Finance Code adopted by chapter 1008 of the 1997 Session Law was, in part, to revise “the state’s general and permanent statute law without substantive change”) (codified at Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 1.001 (West 1998)). Indeed, section 31.”
Unknown.
“§ 1 (stating that the purpose of the Finance Code adopted by chapter 1008 of the 1997 Session Law was, in part, to revise “the state’s general and permanent statute law without substantive change”) (codified at TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 1.001 (West 1998)).”
C & H Nationwide Inc v. Norwest Bank Texas (5th Cir. 2000).
“§ 1 (stating that the purpose of the Finance Code adopted by chapter 1008 of the 1997 Session Law was, in part, to revise “the state’s general and permanent statute law without substantive change”) (codified at TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 1.001 (West 1998)).”
Rodney Elkins v. State (Tex. App. 2000).
“See Tex. Fin. Code Ann. §1.001 (West 1998). Because the three interest rates now charged to Elkins were specifically set forth in the notes he signed, the post-judgment interest award incorporating these three interest rates is not ambiguous or vague.”
— Tex. Fin. Code § 1.001(a) — 3 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.