Texas Codes

Tex. Prop. Code § 162.001 (2026)

Construction Payments And Loan Receipts As Trust Funds

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 162.001. CONSTRUCTION PAYMENTS AND LOAN RECEIPTS AS TRUST FUNDS. (a) Construction payments are trust funds under this chapter if the payments are made to a contractor or subcontractor or to an officer, director, or agent of a contractor or subcontractor, under a construction contract for the improvement of specific real property in this state.

(b) Loan receipts are trust funds under this chapter if the funds are borrowed by a contractor, subcontractor, or owner or by an officer, director, or agent of a contractor, subcontractor, or owner for the purpose of improving specific real property in this state, and the loan is secured in whole or in part by a lien on the property.

(c) A fee payable to a contractor is not considered trust funds if:

(1) the contractor and property owner have entered into a written construction contract for the improvement of specific real property in this state before the commencement of construction of the improvement and the contract provides for the payment by the owner of the costs of construction and a reasonable fee specified in the contract payable to the contractor; and

(2) the fee is earned as provided by the contract and paid to the contractor or disbursed from a construction account described by Section 162.006, if applicable.

(d) Trust funds paid to a creditor under this chapter are not property or an interest in property of a debtor who is a trustee described by Section 162.002.

Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 3720, ch. 576, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1984. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1018, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Amended by:

Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1277 (H.B. 1513), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2009.

Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1277 (H.B. 1513), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2009.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 117 cases (20 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Kelly v. Gen. Interior Constr., Inc., 301 S.W.3d 653 (Tex. 2010).
White v. Salcedo (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 2025). · cites it 2× “18 Defendants dispute these allegations, and argue the funds at issue are not trust funds under the CTFA pursuant to Tex. Prop. Code § 162.001(c).19 Considering the evidence submitted in the light most favorable to the non-movant, Plaintiffs have not carried their summary…”
Nooruddin (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2025).
Hann v. Kahkeshani (5th Cir. 2023). · cites it 2×
— Tex. Prop. Code § 162.001(a) — 36 cases
Kelly v. Gen. Interior Constr., Inc., 301 S.W.3d 653 (Tex. 2010).
Vast Constr., LLC v. CTC Contractors, LLC, 526 S.W.3d 709 (Tex. App. 2017).
Lively v. Carpet Servs., Inc., 904 S.W.2d 868 (Tex. App. 1995).
Francis v. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp., 130 S.W.3d 76 (Tex. App. 2003).
— Tex. Prop. Code § 162.001(b) — 1 case
Choy v. Graziano Roofing of Texas, Inc., 322 S.W.3d 276 (Tex. App. 2009).
— Tex. Prop. Code § 162.001(c) — 3 cases
Kirschner v. State, 997 S.W.2d 335 (Tex. App. 1999).
White v. Salcedo (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 2025). “18 Defendants dispute these allegations, and argue the funds at issue are not trust funds under the CTFA pursuant to Tex. Prop. Code § 162.001(c).19 Considering the evidence submitted in the light most favorable to the non-movant, Plaintiffs have not carried their summary…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.