Texas Codes

Tex. Prop. Code § 21.048 (2026)

Statement Of Damages And Costs

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 21.048. STATEMENT OF DAMAGES AND COSTS. After the special commissioners in an eminent domain proceeding have assessed the damages, they shall:

(1) make a written statement of their decision stating the damages, date it, sign it, and file it and all other papers connected with the proceeding with the court on the day the decision is made or on the next working day after the day the decision is made; and

(2) make and sign a written statement of the accrued costs of the proceeding, naming the party against whom the costs are adjudged, and file the statement with the court.

Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 3507, ch. 576, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1984. Amended by Acts 1984, 68th Leg., 2nd C.S., ch. 18, Sec. 1(c), eff. Oct. 2, 1984.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: In Re STATE of Texas, 85 S.W.3d 871 (Tex. App. 2002).
In Re STATE of Texas, 85 S.W.3d 871 (Tex. App. 2002). “” Tex. PROp.Code Ann. § 21.048(2). The Bill of Costs filed in the instant case does not state that the expenses are accrued costs of the proceeding or adjudge the expenses against the State.”
In Re Energy Transfer Fuel, LP, 250 S.W.3d 178 (Tex. App. 2008). “Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 21.048 (Vernon 2000).”
State v. Garland, 963 S.W.2d 95 (Tex. App. 1998). “3 See Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 21.048 (West 1984).”
State v. Titan Land Dev. Inc. & Bauer-Hockley 550, L.P., 468 S.W.3d 705 (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 21.048 (Vernon 2014).”
State v. Titan Land Dev. Inc. & Bauer-Hockley 550, L.P. (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “v, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8 TEX. PROP. CODE §21.048 .................”
Pappas Restaurants, Inc. & Pappas Bar-B-Q, Inc. v. State of Texas (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “APPENDIX E Tex. Prop. Code § 21.048 ................”
Pappas Restaurants, Inc. & Pappas Bar-B-Q, Inc. v. State of Texas (Tex. App. 2016). “” TEX. PROP. CODE § 21.048. The clerk of the court must “send notice of the decision by certified or registered United States 7 mail, return receipt requested, to the parties in the proceeding, or to their attorneys of record, at their addresses of record.”
Neil O. Yelderman v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2021). “at *3 (quoting TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 21.048). “Either party may challenge the special commissioners’ award by filing ‘a written statement of the objections and their grounds’ in the trial court.”
The State of Texas v. REME, L.L.C., a Texas Ltd. Liab. Co. (Tex. App. 2023). “Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 21.048 (emphasis added).”
Interstate 35W at FM 407, LP v. the State of Texas (2026). “” TEX. PROP. CODE § 21.048(1). The clerk of the court must then “send notice of the decision .”
in Re: The State of Texas (Tex. App. 2002). “" Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 21.048 (2). The Bill of Costs filed in the instant case does not state that the expenses are accrued costs of the proceeding or adjudge the expenses against the State.”
Copano NGL Servs., LLC v. John Ashcraft, Individually & as Tr. for the John Ashcraft Fam. Trust 2012 (Tex. App. 2015). “] of an untimely filing by directly linking the period during TEX. PROP.CODE ANN. § 21.048(1) (Vernon 2014).”
— Tex. Prop. Code § 21.048(1) — 3 cases
State v. Titan Land Dev. Inc. & Bauer-Hockley 550, L.P., 468 S.W.3d 705 (Tex. App. 2015). “See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 21.048 (Vernon 2014).”
Interstate 35W at FM 407, LP v. the State of Texas (2026). “” TEX. PROP. CODE § 21.048(1). The clerk of the court must then “send notice of the decision .”
Copano NGL Servs., LLC v. John Ashcraft, Individually & as Tr. for the John Ashcraft Fam. Trust 2012 (Tex. App. 2015). “] of an untimely filing by directly linking the period during TEX. PROP.CODE ANN. § 21.048(1) (Vernon 2014).”
— Tex. Prop. Code § 21.048(2) — 1 case
In Re STATE of Texas, 85 S.W.3d 871 (Tex. App. 2002). “” Tex. PROp.Code Ann. § 21.048(2). The Bill of Costs filed in the instant case does not state that the expenses are accrued costs of the proceeding or adjudge the expenses against the State.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.