20 U.S.C. § 1652
Repealed. Pub. L. 117–328, div. H, title III, § 313, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 4898
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1972–1987 · leading case: Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (1973)
“VIII, 802(a), 20 U.S.C.A. §1652 (a) (Supp. 1973).”
Kelley v. METROPOLITAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, TENN. (1973)
“” 20 U.S.C. § 1652 (a). The use of ESAA funds for busing was authorized, therefore, in those cases where the school officials had voluntarily requested funds for such an activity and where the transportation was not for the purpose of achieving a racial balance in the schools.”
DRUMMOND Et Al. v. ACREE Et Al. (1972)
“” Education Amendments of 1972, § 802 (a), 20 U. S. C. § 1652 (a) (1970 ed., Supp.”
Carroll v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE (1976)
“Chapter 157A, should be computed on the basis of transportation of students within that district to the nearest school available to them; and (2) Title 20 U.S.C. § 1652 (a), Title 20 U.”
Board of Education of City School District of Cincinnati v. Department of Health, Education & Welfare (1987)
“…or transportation of students or teachers in order to overcome racial imbalance.” 20 U.S.C. § 1652 (1974 Supp. IV). 12. The Emergency School Aid Act grants were administered by HEW’s Assistant Secretary for Education. Applications for ESAA funds were processed by Office…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.