10 U.S.C. § 1

FINDINGS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

“Congress finds the following:“(1) The Corps of Engineers and other Federal agencies are required to preserve and catalogue artifacts and other items of national historical significance that are uncovered during the course of their work (notably under part 79 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations).“(2) Uncatalogued artifacts within the care of Federal agencies are stored in hundreds of repositories and museums across the Nation.“(3) In October 2009, the Corps of Engineers, Center of Expertise for the Curation and Management of Archaeological Collections, initiated the Veterans’ Curation Program to employ and train Iraq and Afghanistan veterans in archaeological processing.“(4) The Veterans’ Curation Program employs veterans and members of the Armed Forces in the sorting, cleaning, and cataloguing of artifacts managed by the Corps of Engineers.“(5) Employees of the Veterans’ Curation Program gain valuable work skills, including computer database management, records management, photographic and scanning techniques, computer software proficiency, vocabulary and writing skills, and interpersonal communication skills, as well as knowledge and training in archaeology and history.“(6) Since 2009, a total of 241 veterans have participated in the Veterans’ Curation Program, including the current class of 38 participants. Of the 203 graduates of the program, 87 percent have received permanent employment in a field related to training received under the program or chosen to continue their education.“(7) Experience in archaeological curation gained through the Veterans’ Curation Program is valuable training and experience for the museum, forensics, administrative, records management, and other fields.“(8) Veterans’ Curation Program participants may assist the Corps of Engineers in developing a more efficient and comprehensive collections management program and also may provide the workforce to meet the records management needs at other agencies and departments, including the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1930–2007 · leading case: Carlos Muniz v. United States, 305 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1962).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Carlos Muniz v. United States, 305 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1962). “10 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. To allow civilian court review in Feres would have subjected military actions to two judicial systems; to disallow it here would subject prison actions to no judicial scrutiny whatever.”

Paulo E. Gallarde v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 486 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “*1147 Finally, 10 U.S.C. § 1 used “liable” and “liable to perform military duty” to describe men subject to the draft: National Forces; persons liable to perform military duty.”

MacMeeken v. MacMeeken (In Re MacMeeken), 117 B.R. 642 (D. Kan. 1990). “Did the bankruptcy court err in holding that 10 U.S.C. § 1 ^08 limited the power of a state divorce court to awarding no more than one-half of disposable military retired pay to the service member’s spouse? The specific issue before the court in Rita MacMeeken’s appeal is…”

Flackman v. Hunter, 75 F. Supp. 871 (D. Kan. 1948). ““Charge III: Violation of the 93rd Article of War [ 10 U.S.C.A. § 1 ^65], “Specification: In that Private First Class Charles C.”

Bland v. United States, 42 F.2d 842 (2d Cir. 1930). “Code, title 10, § 1 (10 USCA § 1). We have, as the necessities of wars required, drafted our male citizens to perform active military services.”

Gallarde v. Ins (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “Finally, 10 U.S.C. § 1 used “liable” and “liable to perform military duty” to describe men subject to the draft: National Forces; persons liable to perform mili- tary duty.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.