10 U.S.C. § 1006

TRAINING OF IRAQI FORCES REGARDING TREATMENT OF DETAINEES.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

“(a)Required Policies.—“(1)In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that policies are prescribed regarding procedures for military and civilian personnel of the Department of Defense and contractor personnel of the Department of Defense in Iraq that are intended to ensure that members of the Armed Forces, and all persons acting on behalf of the Armed Forces or within facilities of the Armed Forces, ensure that all personnel of Iraqi military forces who are trained by Department of Defense personnel and contractor personnel of the Department of Defense receive training regarding the international obligations and laws applicable to the humane detention of detainees, including protections afforded under the Geneva Conventions and the Convention Against Torture.“(2)Acknowledgment of training.—The Secretary shall ensure that, for all personnel of the Iraqi Security Forces who are provided training referred to in paragraph (1), there is documented acknowledgment of such training having been provided.“(3)Deadline for policies to be prescribed.—The policies required by paragraph (1) shall be prescribed not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 30, 2005].“(b)Army Field Manual.—“(1)Translation.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for the United States Army Field Manual on Intelligence Interrogation to be translated into arabic [sic] and any other language the Secretary determines appropriate for use by members of the Iraqi military forces.“(2)Distribution.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for such manual, as translated, to be provided to each unit of the Iraqi military forces trained by Department of Defense personnel or contractor personnel of the Department of Defense.“(c)Transmittal of Regulations.—Not less than 30 days after the date on which regulations, policies, and orders are first prescribed under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives copies of such regulations, policies, or orders, together with a report on steps taken to the date of the report to implement this section.“(d)Annual Report.—Not less than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 30, 2005], and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of this section.”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1967–1989 · leading case: Robert A. Pauls, Etc. v. The Sec'y of the Air Force, 457 F.2d 294 (1st Cir. 1972).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Robert A. Pauls, Etc. v. The Sec'y of the Air Force, 457 F.2d 294 (1st Cir. 1972). “Pauls contends in his brief before us that he is entitled under 10 U.S.C.A. § 1006 to be retained in service absent a promotion by reason of his eighteen years of service.”

Raymond R. Ridgely, Col., Usar v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Sec'y of the Army, 866 F.2d 1526 (D.C. Cir. 1989). · cites it 2× “Reservists who have completed eighteen years of service are protected by 10 U.S.C. §§ 1006 , 1163(d) (1982) from involuntary release from active duty if they are within two years of qualifying for retirement.”

Robert A. Pauls, Captain, United States Air Force v. Dr. Robert C. Seamans, Sec'y of the Air Force, 468 F.2d 361 (1st Cir. 1972). “We have earlier stayed the injunction, reserving decision on the request for summary reversal, to which we now address ourselves. To begin with, the district court, quite understandably, was led to believe that more statutes and regulations are involved here than is in fact true.”

Fogg v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 605 (Ct. Cl. 1967). “§ 1331 (a) (3), that he was not eligible for retention under 10 U.S.C. § 1006 , and would not be eligible for retired pay upon attaining age 60.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.