10 U.S.C. § 1053a

Repealed. Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title VI, § 621(c)(2)(A), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 784]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2004–2004 · leading case: Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 370 F.3d 1214 (D.C. Cir. 2004).
Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 370 F.3d 1214 (D.C. Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “To the extent that FLRA looked to 10 U.S.C. § 1053a as support for its conclusion that Provision 2 reimbursements are not implicitly authorized by the 2000 Appropriations Act, its reliance was misplaced.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 1053a(a) — 1 case
Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 370 F.3d 1214 (D.C. Cir. 2004). “To the extent that FLRA looked to 10 U.S.C. § 1053a as support for its conclusion that Provision 2 reimbursements are not implicitly authorized by the 2000 Appropriations Act, its reliance was misplaced.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.