10 U.S.C. § 130b
Personnel in overseas, sensitive, or routinely deployable units: nondisclosure of personally identifying information
2002—Subsecs. (a), (c)(4)(C). Pub. L. 107–296 substituted “of Homeland Security” for “of Transportation”.
Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2006–2026 · leading case: Hall v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 881 F. Supp. 2d 38 (D.D.C. 2012).
Hall v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 881 F. Supp. 2d 38 (D.D.C. 2012). “Plaintiffs also argue that the Department of Defense inappropriately invoked exemption 3 in relation to 10 U.S.C. § 130b, because the statute is “clearly discretionary” and therefore not an exemption 3 statute.”
Rosenberg v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 342 F. Supp. 3d 62 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “According to the *90 agency's declaration, the information redacted from Record 272 is "withheld under the specific authority of 10 U.S.C. § 130b," see McCubbin Decl. ¶ 39, which authorizes the withholding from disclosure to the public "personally identifying information…”
O'Keefe v. United States Dep't of Def., 463 F. Supp. 2d 317 (E.D.N.Y 2006). “As the applicable statute, the DOD cites 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a), which provides that the Secretary of Defense may, notwithstanding [FOIA], authorize to be withheld from disclosure to the public personally identifying information, regarding — (1) any member of the armed forces…”
In Re Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litig., 787 F. Supp. 2d 5 (D.D.C. 2011). “The government’s rationales for seeking to seal this information are that (1)10 U.S.C § 130b exempts from public disclosure personally-identifying information about any employee whose duty station is with a unit involved in collecting, handling, disposing or storing classified…”
Bloche v. Dep't of Def., 370 F. Supp. 3d 40 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “2012) (concluding that 10 U.S.C. § 130b permits agencies to withhold under FOIA Exemption 3 information concerning "any member of the armed forces assigned to .”
Jud. Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 963 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D.D.C. 2013). “§ 552 (b)(3); see 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a) (authorizing the Secretary of Defense to withhold “personally identifying information regarding (1) any member of the armed forces assigned to .”
Connell v. United States S. Command (D.D.C. 2020). “5 This, then, leaves two disputed groups of withholdings: (1) those made pursuant to FOIA Exemption (b)(3) and 10 U.S.C. § 130b and (2) those made pursuant to FOIA Exemption (b)(6).”
Connecticut Vets. Legal Ctr. & Stronghold Freedom Found. v. Dep't of Def. (D. Conn. 2026). “” 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a). “Personally identifying information” includes a person’s “name, rank, duty address, and official title and information regarding the person’s pay.”
Wp Co. LLC v. Special Inspector Gen. for Afghanistan Reconstruction (D.D.C. 2020). “3 § 7(b) (“IG Act”), 2) 10 U.S.C. § 130b, and 3) section 102A(i)(1) of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.”
Wp Co. LLC v. Special Inspector Gen. for Afghanistan Reconstruction (D.D.C. 2021). “3 § 7(b), pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 130b as to SIGAR or as to the United States Special Operations Command (“USSOCOM”), or under Exemption 7(D), given its findings with respect to Exemption 7(C).”
Rosenberg v. United States Dep't of Def. (D.D.C. 2018). “According to the agency’s declaration, the information redacted from Record 272 is “withheld under the specific authority of 10 U.S.C. § 130b,” see McCubbin Decl. ¶ 39, which authorizes the withholding from disclosure to the public “personally identifying information regarding .”
The New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Def. (S.D.N.Y. 2021). “Here, the Government invokes 10 U.S.C. § 130b as the applicable qualifying statute.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a) — 5 cases
O'Keefe v. United States Dep't of Def., 463 F. Supp. 2d 317 (E.D.N.Y 2006). “As the applicable statute, the DOD cites 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a), which provides that the Secretary of Defense may, notwithstanding [FOIA], authorize to be withheld from disclosure to the public personally identifying information, regarding — (1) any member of the armed forces…”
In Re Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litig., 787 F. Supp. 2d 5 (D.D.C. 2011). “The government’s rationales for seeking to seal this information are that (1)10 U.S.C § 130b exempts from public disclosure personally-identifying information about any employee whose duty station is with a unit involved in collecting, handling, disposing or storing classified…”
Jud. Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 963 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D.D.C. 2013). “§ 552 (b)(3); see 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a) (authorizing the Secretary of Defense to withhold “personally identifying information regarding (1) any member of the armed forces assigned to .”
Connecticut Vets. Legal Ctr. & Stronghold Freedom Found. v. Dep't of Def. (D. Conn. 2026). “” 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a). “Personally identifying information” includes a person’s “name, rank, duty address, and official title and information regarding the person’s pay.”
Connell v. United States S. Command (D.D.C. 2020). “5 This, then, leaves two disputed groups of withholdings: (1) those made pursuant to FOIA Exemption (b)(3) and 10 U.S.C. § 130b and (2) those made pursuant to FOIA Exemption (b)(6).”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a)(1) — 3 cases
Rosenberg v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 342 F. Supp. 3d 62 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “According to the *90 agency's declaration, the information redacted from Record 272 is "withheld under the specific authority of 10 U.S.C. § 130b," see McCubbin Decl. ¶ 39, which authorizes the withholding from disclosure to the public "personally identifying information…”
Rosenberg v. United States Dep't of Def. (D.D.C. 2018). “According to the agency’s declaration, the information redacted from Record 272 is “withheld under the specific authority of 10 U.S.C. § 130b,” see McCubbin Decl. ¶ 39, which authorizes the withholding from disclosure to the public “personally identifying information regarding .”
Connell v. United States S. Command (D.D.C. 2020). “5 This, then, leaves two disputed groups of withholdings: (1) those made pursuant to FOIA Exemption (b)(3) and 10 U.S.C. § 130b and (2) those made pursuant to FOIA Exemption (b)(6).”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130b(c)(1) — 2 cases
Connell v. United States S. Command (D.D.C. 2020). “5 This, then, leaves two disputed groups of withholdings: (1) those made pursuant to FOIA Exemption (b)(3) and 10 U.S.C. § 130b and (2) those made pursuant to FOIA Exemption (b)(6).”
Connecticut Vets. Legal Ctr. & Stronghold Freedom Found. v. Dep't of Def. (D. Conn. 2026). “” 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a). “Personally identifying information” includes a person’s “name, rank, duty address, and official title and information regarding the person’s pay.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130b(c)(3) — 1 case
Connecticut Vets. Legal Ctr. & Stronghold Freedom Found. v. Dep't of Def. (D. Conn. 2026). “” 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a). “Personally identifying information” includes a person’s “name, rank, duty address, and official title and information regarding the person’s pay.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130b(c)(4) — 1 case
Connecticut Vets. Legal Ctr. & Stronghold Freedom Found. v. Dep't of Def. (D. Conn. 2026). “” 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a). “Personally identifying information” includes a person’s “name, rank, duty address, and official title and information regarding the person’s pay.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130b(c)(5) — 1 case
Connecticut Vets. Legal Ctr. & Stronghold Freedom Found. v. Dep't of Def. (D. Conn. 2026). “” 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a). “Personally identifying information” includes a person’s “name, rank, duty address, and official title and information regarding the person’s pay.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130b(e)(5) — 1 case
O'Keefe v. United States Dep't of Def., 463 F. Supp. 2d 317 (E.D.N.Y 2006). “As the applicable statute, the DOD cites 10 U.S.C. § 130b(a), which provides that the Secretary of Defense may, notwithstanding [FOIA], authorize to be withheld from disclosure to the public personally identifying information, regarding — (1) any member of the armed forces…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.