Notes of Decisions
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
· cites it 36× “Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't of Def., 389 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).
· cites it 10× “The relevant statute, 10 U.S.C. § 130c, authorizes the withholding of “sensitive information” to the extent such withholding is requested by a foreign government or international organization.”
Associated Press v. United States Dep't of Def., 554 F.3d 274 (2d Cir. 2009).
· cites it 3× “provided that such statute (A) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue, or (B) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld.”
United States v. Ng Lap Seng, 934 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2019).
· cites it 2× “This conclusion finds further support in statutes that refer separately to “foreign governments” and “international organizations,” even when Congress chooses to apply the law equally to both.”
Mobley v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 924 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D.D.C. 2013).
“2008), which dealt with the Department of Defense’s reliance on a different statute — 10 U.S.C. § 130c — to invoke FOIA Exemption 3.”
Ctr. for Pub. Integrity v. U.S. Dep't of Def. (D.D.C. 2020).
· cites it 12× “As to the withholdings under FOIA Exemption 3, the Court concludes that Defendants have shown that the withholdings are appropriate under 10 U.S.C. § 130c, which allows for the withholding of sensitive information of foreign governments.”
Associated Press v. United States Dep't of Def. (2d Cir. 2009).
· cites it 3× “The district court reasoned 8 that while 10 U.S.C. § 130c is an applicable withholding statute,5 the documents did not arguably or logically fall within its scope and thus did not fall under Exemption 3.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(a) — 3 cases
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
“Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't of Def., 389 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).
“The relevant statute, 10 U.S.C. § 130c, authorizes the withholding of “sensitive information” to the extent such withholding is requested by a foreign government or international organization.”
Ctr. for Pub. Integrity v. U.S. Dep't of Def. (D.D.C. 2020).
“As to the withholdings under FOIA Exemption 3, the Court concludes that Defendants have shown that the withholdings are appropriate under 10 U.S.C. § 130c, which allows for the withholding of sensitive information of foreign governments.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(b) — 4 cases
Associated Press v. United States Dep't of Def., 554 F.3d 274 (2d Cir. 2009).
“provided that such statute (A) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue, or (B) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld.”
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
“Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
Ctr. for Pub. Integrity v. U.S. Dep't of Def. (D.D.C. 2020).
“As to the withholdings under FOIA Exemption 3, the Court concludes that Defendants have shown that the withholdings are appropriate under 10 U.S.C. § 130c, which allows for the withholding of sensitive information of foreign governments.”
Associated Press v. United States Dep't of Def. (2d Cir. 2009).
“The district court reasoned 8 that while 10 U.S.C. § 130c is an applicable withholding statute,5 the documents did not arguably or logically fall within its scope and thus did not fall under Exemption 3.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(b)(1) — 1 case
Ctr. for Pub. Integrity v. U.S. Dep't of Def. (D.D.C. 2020).
“As to the withholdings under FOIA Exemption 3, the Court concludes that Defendants have shown that the withholdings are appropriate under 10 U.S.C. § 130c, which allows for the withholding of sensitive information of foreign governments.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(b)(2) — 1 case
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
“Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(b)(3) — 1 case
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
“Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(b)(3)(C) — 1 case
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't of Def., 389 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).
“The relevant statute, 10 U.S.C. § 130c, authorizes the withholding of “sensitive information” to the extent such withholding is requested by a foreign government or international organization.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(b)(l) — 2 cases
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
“Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't of Def., 389 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).
“The relevant statute, 10 U.S.C. § 130c, authorizes the withholding of “sensitive information” to the extent such withholding is requested by a foreign government or international organization.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(d) — 1 case
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
“Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(d)(2) — 1 case
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
“Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(d)(2)(C) — 1 case
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
“Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(d)(3) — 1 case
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
“Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(g) — 1 case
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
“Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(g)(l) — 1 case
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
“Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 130c(h) — 1 case
Nat'l Inst. of Military Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 404 F. Supp. 2d 325 (D.D.C. 2005).
“Section 130c provides that certain national security officials, in this case the Secretary of Defense, can withhold from public disclosure sensitive information of foreign governments.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.