10 U.S.C. § 1375
Entitlement to commission: commissioned officers advanced on retired list
A commissioned officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force who is advanced on a retired list is entitled to a commission in the grade to which he is advanced.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1944–1965 · leading case: Thompson v. Baltimore & OR Co., 155 F.2d 767 (8th Cir. 1946).
Thompson v. Baltimore & OR Co., 155 F.2d 767 (8th Cir. 1946). “Some of such routes are more direct and convenient for the government’s use than are the available land grant routes. For the purpose of securing a part of the government business the plaintiffs and the defendants and many other railroads, acting pursuant to the authority of §…”
N. Pac. Ry. Co. v. United States, 330 U.S. 248 (1947). “477 , 486, 10 U. S. C. § 1375 . It qualified to receive the higher rates authorized by § 321 (a) of the Transportation Act of 1940 by the timely filing of the required release of land-grant claims pursuant to § 321 (b) of the Act.”
United States v. Powell, 330 U.S. 238 (1947). “The cases are here on petitions for writs of certiorari which we granted because of the importance of determining the controlling principle for settlement of the many claims of this character against the Government. For years the land-grant rate was fifty per cent of the…”
S. Ry. Co. v. United States, 322 U.S. 72 (1944). “477 , 486, 10 U. S. C. § 1375 . “Railroads which compete with the reduced-rate lines found themselves unable to participate, not only in the local transportation of federal troops and property between the termini of the reduced-rate lines, but also in through movements from and…”
Baltimore & OR Co. v. Thompson, 80 F. Supp. 570 (E.D. Mo. 1948). “486 , 10 U.S.C.A. § 1375 . [3] The latter statute created a competitive disability for all railroads having no land grant mileage, if its lines were located so it had to compete with railroads having land grant mileage.”
Thompson v. Baltimore & OR Co., 59 F. Supp. 21 (E.D. Mo. 1945). “[4] 10 U.S.C.A. § 1375 "Charges for transportation by land-grant railroads subject to regulation by Congress.”
Powell v. United States, 60 F. Supp. 433 (E.D. Va. 1945). “486 , 10 U.S.C.A. § 1375 . By virtue of the decisions cited and the Act of 1924, the railroads transported over those portions of their respective lines constituting the “land grant” portions, all property of the United States, as well as troops without limitation as to the…”
Willis D. Friestedt v. The United States, 352 F.2d 530 (Ct. Cl. 1965). “); 10 U.S.C. § 1375 (1958 Ed.); 37 U.S.C. § 115 (1958 Ed.”
Nat'l Carloading Corp. v. United States, 221 F.2d 81 (D.C. Cir. 1955). “477 , 486, 10 U.S.C. § 1375 [10 U.S. C.A. § 1375J; United States v.”
Thompson v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. (Two Cases). St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 180 F.2d 416 (8th Cir. 1950). “” During the complaint period in this case, from 1934 to 1946, charges for transportation of government property by land-grant railroads were prescribed by 10 U.S. C.A. § 1375, which section provided that “Payments” for such charges “shall not exceed 50 per centum of the full…”
S. Pac. Co. v. Def. Supplies Corp., 64 F. Supp. 605 (N.D. Cal. 1946). “However, by the Act of 1940, as to those carriers who theretofore released and quit-claimed to the United States the lands previously granted to them by the government, § 321(b), the land-grant deductions allowed the United States apply only to military or naval property of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.