10 U.S.C. § 1510

Applicability to Coast Guard

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Designated Officer To Have Responsibility.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall designate an officer of the Department of Homeland Security to have responsibility within the Department of Homeland Security for matters relating to missing persons who are members of the Coast Guard.(b)Procedures.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall prescribe procedures for the determination of the status of persons described in section 1501(c) of this title who are members of the Coast Guard and for the collection, analysis, review, and update of information on such persons. To the maximum extent practicable, the procedures prescribed under this section shall be similar to the procedures prescribed by the Secretary of Defense under section 1501(b) of this title.(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, § 569(b)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 349; amended Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, § 1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–296 substituted “of Homeland Security” for “of Transportation” wherever appearing.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1933–1982 · leading case: United States v. Robert C. Thetford, 676 F.2d 170 (5th Cir. 1982).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Robert C. Thetford, 676 F.2d 170 (5th Cir. 1982). “A simple retaliatory threat is not covered by 10 U.S.C. § 1510 if there is “no basis whatever in the record for the jury to infer that the purpose of the [statement] was to deter future communications.”

United States v. Nichols, 2 C.M.A. 27 (1952). “” [Emphasis supplied] Article of War 39, 10 USC § 1510 , provided as follows: “Except for desertion or absence without leave committed in time of war, or for mutiny or murder, no person subject to military law shall be liable to be tried or punished by a court-martial for any…”

United States v. Meyer, 1 C.M.A. 164 (1952). “In the same section the following additional legislation was specified with like effect: Article of War 39,10 USCA § 1510, providing that wartime desertion should be subject to no period of limitation; Article of War 48, 10 USCA § 1519, which inter alia dispensed with…”

United States v. Hattley, 3 C.M.A. 114 (1953). “Winthrop in his Military Law and Precedents, Second Edition, Reprint 1920, at page 616, in discussing Article of War 39, 10 USC § 1510 , sets out the object of the Article.”

Terry v. United States, 2 F. Supp. 962 (W.D. Wash. 1933). “794 , 10 USCA § 1510) provides: “Except for desertion committed in time of war, or for mutiny or murder, no person subject to military law shall be liable to be tried or punished by a court-martial for any crime or offense committed more than two years before the arraignment of…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.