10 U.S.C. § 1511
Return alive of person declared missing or dead
2001—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–107 substituted “
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1940–2023 · leading case: Wade v. Hunter, 336 U.S. 684 (1949).
Wade v. Hunter, 336 U.S. 684 (1949). “795 , 10 U. S. C. § 1511 . That article provides in part as follows: “No person shall, without his consent, be tried a second time for the same offense; but no proceeding in which an accused has been found guilty by a court-martial upon any charge or specification shall be held…”
Sanford v. Robbins, 115 F.2d 435 (5th Cir. 1940). “As applied to courts-martial the provision against double jeopardy finds expression in Article of War 40, 10 U.S.C.A. § 1511 , “No person shall, without his consent, be tried a second time for the same offense.”
United States v. Bayer, 156 F.2d 964 (2d Cir. 1946). “§ 1522 ; and by the terms of Article 40, 10 U.S.C.A. § 1511 , no proceeding in which an accused is found guilty by court-martial shall be held to be a trial to bar a further trial for the same offense “until the reviewing and, if there be one, the confirming authority shall have…”
Wade v. Hunter, 72 F. Supp. 755 (D. Kan. 1947). “Petitioner alleges that the order is illegal and void for several reasons, the chief one urged being that he had been twice put in jeopardy for the same offense in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution and the Fortieth Article of War, 10 U.S.C.A. § 1511 . There is…”
Anderson v. Hunter, 177 F.2d 770 (10th Cir. 1949). “§ 1511 , provides among other things that no person shall without his consent be tried a second time for the same offense, and that no authority shall return a record of trial to any court-martial for reconsideration of the sentence originally imposed with a view to increasing…”
Wallace v. United States Army (D. Neb. 2023). “Liberally construed, the Court understands Wallace to be seeking injunctive relief as well as damages for lost wages pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1511 . This statute allows servicemembers who were declared dead to recover benefits they lost as a result of their declaration of death…”
Ex Parte Steele, 79 F. Supp. 428 (M.D. Penn. 1948). “§ 1517 , it is also provided in Article of War 47, 10 U.S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.