10 U.S.C. § 1565

DNA identification information: collection from certain offenders; use

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Collection of DNA Samples.—(1) The Secretary concerned shall collect a DNA sample from each member of the armed forces under the Secretary’s jurisdiction who is, or has been, convicted of a qualifying military offense (as determined under subsection (d)).(2) For each member described in paragraph (1), if the Combined DNA Index System (in this section referred to as “CODIS”) of the Federal Bureau of Investigation contains a DNA analysis with respect to that member, or if a DNA sample has been or is to be collected from that member under section 3(a) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, the Secretary concerned may (but need not) collect a DNA sample from that member.(3) The Secretary concerned may enter into agreements with other Federal agencies, units of State or local government, or private entities to provide for the collection of samples described in paragraph (1).(b)Analysis and Use of Samples.—The Secretary concerned shall furnish each DNA sample collected under subsection (a) to the Secretary of Defense. The Secretary of Defense shall—(1) carry out a DNA analysis on each such DNA sample in a manner that complies with the requirements for inclusion of that analysis in CODIS; and(2) furnish the results of each such analysis to the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for inclusion in CODIS.(c)Definitions.—In this section:(1) The term “DNA sample” means a tissue, fluid, or other bodily sample of an individual on which a DNA analysis can be carried out.(2) The term “DNA analysis” means analysis of the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) identification information in a bodily sample.(d)Qualifying Military Offenses.—The offenses that shall be treated for purposes of this section as qualifying military offenses are the following offenses, as determined by the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Attorney General:(1) Any offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice for which a sentence of confinement for more than one year may be imposed.(2) Any other offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice that is comparable to a qualifying Federal offense (as determined under section 3(d) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 14135a(d))).11 See References in Text note below.(e)Expungement.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall promptly expunge, from the index described in subsection (a) of section 210304 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, the DNA analysis of a person included in the index on the basis of a qualifying military offense if the Secretary receives, for each conviction of the person of a qualifying offense, a certified copy of a final court order establishing that such conviction has been overturned.(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “qualifying offense” means any of the following offenses:(A) A qualifying Federal offense, as determined under section 3 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000.(B) A qualifying District of Columbia offense, as determined under section 4 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000.(C) A qualifying military offense.(3) For purposes of paragraph (1), a court order is not “final” if time remains for an appeal or application for discretionary review with respect to the order.(f)Regulations.—This section shall be carried out under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General. Those regulations shall apply, to the extent practicable, uniformly throughout the armed forces.(Added Pub. L. 106–546, § 5(a)(1), Dec. 19, 2000, 114 Stat. 2731; amended Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, § 1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314; Pub. L. 108–405, title II, § 203(c), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2270.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Section 3 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, referred to in subsecs. (a)(2), (d)(2), and (e)(2)(A), is section 3 of Pub. L. 106–546, which was classified to section 14135a of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification as section 40702 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

Section 4 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, referred to in subsec. (e)(2)(B), is section 4 of Pub. L. 106–546, which is classified to section 40703 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

The Uniform Code of Military Justice, referred to in subsec. (d), is classified to chapter 47 (§ 801 et seq.) of this title.

Section 210304 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, referred to in subsec. (e)(1), is classified to section 12592 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

Amendments

2004—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 108–405 reenacted heading without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

“(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall determine those felony or sexual offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice that shall be treated for purposes of this section as qualifying military offenses.

“(2) An offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice that is comparable to a qualifying Federal offense (as determined under section 3(d) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000), as determined by the Secretary in consultation with the Attorney General, shall be treated for purposes of this section as a qualifying military offense.”

2002—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 107–296 substituted “of Homeland Security” for “of Transportation”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Initial Determination of Qualifying Military Offenses

Pub. L. 106–546, § 5(b), Dec. 19, 2000, 114 Stat. 2733, provided that: “The initial determination of qualifying military offenses under section 1565(d) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1), shall be made not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 19, 2000].”

Commencement of Collection

Pub. L. 106–546, § 5(c), Dec. 19, 2000, 114 Stat. 2733, provided that: “Collection of DNA samples under section 1565(a) of such title, as added by subsection (a)(1), shall, subject to the availability of appropriations, commence not later than the date that is 60 days after the date of the initial determination referred to in subsection (b) [set out above].”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 75 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1942–2025 · leading case: United States v. Lucido

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Lucido (2010) ca6 · cites it 2× “§ 14132 (d); 10 U.S.C. § 1565 (e). All told, however, no statute authorizes the district court to entertain this type of expungement motion.”

United States v. Thomas Cameron Kincade (2004) ca9 “§ 14135b, and the Armed Forces, 10 U.S.C. § 1565 . The Act also appropriates $170 million to support state efforts to collect and to store DNA profiles from state offenders and crime scene evidence.”

United States v. Rakesh Wahi (2017) ca7 “, 10 U.S.C. § 1565 (e) (requiring expungement of DNA records if a military conviction is overturned); 42 U.”

United States v. Eileen Crowell (2004) ca9 “…DNA analysis be expunged from certain indices when a conviction has been overturned. 10 U.S.C. § 1565 (e); 42 U.S.C. § 14132 (d). See also 18 U.S.C. § 921 (a)(20), (33)(B)(ii) (defining certain crimes to exclude convictions that have been expung”

United States v. Coloian (2007) ca1 “§§ 552a(d), (g)(1)(C) (allowing claims to amend public records that are inaccurate); 10 U.S.C. § 1565 (e) (mandating expungement of DNA records when military conviction is overturned); 18 U.”

United States v. Stacey Field (2014) ca6 “, 10 U.S.C. § 1565 (e) (requiring expungement of DNA records when a court overturns a military conviction); 18 U.”

United States v. Douglas (2017) cadc “%20%C2%A7%201565"> 10 U.S.C. § 1565 (e) (mandating expungement of DNA records when courts overturn military convictions); <extracted-citation index="3" url="https://cite.”

United States v. Stewart (2007) mad “§§ 14135 -14135e and 10 U.S.C. § 1565 , and in accordance with the special conditions of his probation.”

United States v. Mitchell (2010) vaed “, 10 U.S.C. § 1565 (e) ("The Secretary of Defense shall promptly expunge .”

United States v. Norris (1953) cma “Larceny, without definition thereof, was made punishable by Article of War 93, 10 U. S. C. § 1565 . The Manual for Courts-Martial, U.”

United States v. Gordon (1952) cma “LATIMER, Judge: The accused, Bernard Gerald Gordon, was initially charged with two offenses in violation of the 93rd and 96th Articles of War, 10 USC §§ 1565 , 1568. The specification of the first charge alleged that on the 5th day of March, 1951, he burglarized the dwelling…”

United States v. Clark (1952) cma “The accused was charged with voluntary manslaughter in violation of Article of War 93, 10 USC § 1565 . The specification reads as follows: “In that [accused] did, at Taegu, Korea, on or about 1 April 1951, feloniously, willfully and unlawfully, kill KO Tong Su by shooting him in…”

Show all 75 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.