10 U.S.C. § 1614
Definitions
2003—Par. (2)(C). Pub. L. 108–136 substituted “National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency” for “National Imagery and Mapping Agency”.
2000—Par. (1). Pub. L. 106–398 substituted “of the Department of Defense” for “of an intelligence component of the Department of Defense or of a military department”.
1999—Par. (3)(B). Pub. L. 106–65 substituted “Committee on Armed Services” for “Committee on National Security”.
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2024 · leading case: Rice v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 522 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
Rice v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 522 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “§ 7511 (b)(8) and 10 U.S.C. § 1614 (2), that render inapplicable the provisions of title 5 governing adverse action appeals.”
Berry v. Conyers, 692 F.3d 1223 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “” 10 U.S.C. § 1614 (2). Neither the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (where Ms.”
Karla M Kornegay v. Dep't of Def. (MSPB 2024). “§ 7511 (b)(8); 10 U.S.C. § 1614 (2)(C). An exception exists for NGA employees who had adverse action appeal rights under chapter 75 with the NGA’s predecessor agencies, the Defense Mapping Agency and National Imagery and Mapping Agency, prior to October 1996, and have continued…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.