10 U.S.C. § 201

CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

“The Secretary shall—“(1) close all military installations recommended for closure by the Commission on Base Realignment and Closure in the report transmitted to the Secretary pursuant to the charter establishing such Commission;“(2) realign all military installations recommended for realignment by such Commission in such report; and“(3) initiate all such closures and realignments no later than September 30, 1991, and complete all such closures and realignments no later than September 30, 1995, except that no such closure or realignment may be initiated before January 1, 1990.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2014 · leading case: Grooms v. United States, 113 Fed. Cl. 651 (Fed. Cl. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Grooms v. United States, 113 Fed. Cl. 651 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “Finally, plaintiff Gi’ooms also suggests, in the “Factual Allegations” section of his complaint, that “the failure to properly adjudicate [his] case violated” his Fifth Amendment Due Process rights.”

Richard R. Grooms v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2014). “§ 204 , “by virtue of the [Army and Navy’s] failure to properly adjudicate their cases in accordance with 10 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.” Lamey et al. Compl.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.