10 U.S.C. § 2410
Renumbered § 3862]
[renumbered]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2023 · leading case: Johnson v. Advanced Eng'g & Plan. Corp., 292 F. Supp. 2d 846 (E.D. Va. 2003).
Johnson v. Advanced Eng'g & Plan. Corp., 292 F. Supp. 2d 846 (E.D. Va. 2003). “204-70 makes clear that the certification required for an REA under 10 U.S.C. § 2410 (a), as implemented in DFARS 252.”
Agility Def. & Gov't Servs., Inc. v. United States, 103 Fed. Cl. 366 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2410 , a contractor requesting an equitable adjustment that exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold 1 must certify that: “(1) the request is made in good faith; and (2) the supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of [the certifier’s]…”
Wright Bros., the Bldg. Co., Eagle LLC (A.S.B.C.A. 2020). “Also included with the letter as an attachment was a certification stating: I certify pursuant to 10 USC § 2410 that the claim set forth in COR 020 (revised March 29, 2019) and with its supporting records, is made in good faith; that the supporting data are accurate and complete…”
Zafer Constr. Co. (A.S.B.C.A. 2017). “Appellant's REA did not include the certification required by 10 U.S.C. § 2410 (a). 67. Paragraph 2 of the 11 April 2006 REA, which is relevant to the parties' dispute before us, stated the following: 2.”
Zafer Constr. Co. (A.S.B.C.A. 2017). “Appellant’s REA did not include the certification required by 10 U.S.C. § 2410 (a). 67. Paragraph 2 of the 11 April 2006 REA, which is relevant to the parties’ dispute before us, stated the following: 2.”
Midatlantic Constr. & Design Assocs., Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2023). “243-7002 and 10 U.S.C. § 2410 . DFAS cannot issue a decision regarding MDCA’s request until it has been properly certified as required by law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.