10 U.S.C. § 332
NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVE NUMBERED 2 LEASE REVENUE ACCOUNT.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1957–1991 · leading case: Laird v. Tatum
Laird v. Tatum (1972)
“" 10 U. S. C. § 332 : "Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State or Territory by the ordinary…”
Arlo Tatum, Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense (1971)
“10 U.S.C. § 332 . Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State or Territory by the ordinary course…”
Ward v. Washington State University (1985)
“030; 10 U.S.C. § 332 . '"[AJctive service'" is any service "requiring the entire time of any .”
Bissonette v. Haig (1985)
“For example, under 10 U.S.C. § 332 , the President may call upon the military only after having determined that domestic unrest makes it “impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings,” and under 10 U.”
Rosenfeld v. United States Department of Justice (1991)
“They also cite their authority to investigate civil disorders pursuant to various statutes, including 10 U.S.C. §§ 332 and 333 (Insurrection), 18 U.”
Jackson v. Kuhn (1957)
“out any constitutional or statutory authority, not having been invited by the Governor of Arkansas or its General Assembly or requested by any federal court; that the actions of the defendants are violative of the Tenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution; that plaintiffs are…”
Use of Potatoes to Block the Maine-Canada Border (1981)
“Presidential authority: In extreme situations, the President may call out the National Guard o r the Army to put down rebellions that threaten enforcement of federal law, 10 U.S.C. §332 ,15 and to protect against deprivations of constitutional rights caused by failure to enforce…”
Use of the National Guard to Support Drug Interdiction Efforts in the District of Columbia (1989)
“94 calling the National Guard for the District into federal service under 10 U.S.C. § 332 . Relying on Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.