10 U.S.C. § 379
Renumbered § 279]
[renumbered]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1989–2013 · leading case: United States v. Leonardo Mendoza-Cecelia, Terry Lee Greenberg, Hector Favio Marin-Hernandez, 963 F.2d 1467 (11th Cir. 1992).
United States v. Leonardo Mendoza-Cecelia, Terry Lee Greenberg, Hector Favio Marin-Hernandez, 963 F.2d 1467 (11th Cir. 1992). “See 10 U.S.C.A. § 379 (West Supp.1992); see also United States v.”
United States v. Cardona-Sandoval, 6 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 1993). “Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 379 (a) (Supp.1992), Coast Guard officials may be assigned to duty aboard Navy vessels to perform drug interdic-lion.”
United States v. Sandoval, 770 F. Supp. 762 (D.P.R. 1991). “Also, under 10 U.S.C.A. § 379 (a) (Supp. 1991), the Secretary of Defense may assign Coast Guard officials to duty aboard Navy ships for law enforcement drug interdiction functions to cover “area[s] outside the land area of the United States .”
Rodriguez v. Martinez, 935 F. Supp. 2d 389 (D.P.R. 2013). “See 10 U.S.C. § 379 (a). The Posse Comitatus Act, 18 U.”
United States v. Luis Lazaro Borrego & Jose O. Paulet, 885 F.2d 822 (11th Cir. 1989). “The arrests and seizures in this case clearly were authorized by Congress under 10 U.S.C. § 379 (1986). The court does not believe, as appellants suggest, that Congress intended the government to obtain prior approval every time the Navy assists the Coast Guard in drug…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.