10 U.S.C. § 3846
[Reserved]
[reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1979–1998 · leading case: Charette v. Walker, 996 F. Supp. 43 (D.D.C. 1998).
Charette v. Walker, 996 F. Supp. 43 (D.D.C. 1998). “Prior to October 1, 1996, 10 U.S.C. § 3846 provided that reserve first lieutenants, captains and majors who were twice non-selected for promotion should be transferred to the Retired Reserves, if qualified therefore, and if not so qualified, should be discharged.”
Sheridon H. Groves v. United States, 47 F.3d 1140 (Fed. Cir. 1995). “But the regulation in question, entitled “Army National Guard and Army Reserve: Separation of Of- *1146 fleers,” does not support the removal of an officer in Groves’ circumstances. Groves suggests, and the government apparently conceded below, that the specific reason for the…”
Diliberti v. United States, 2 Cl. Ct. 404 (Ct. Cl. 1983). “As a result of these two “pass overs,” plaintiff was notified in November 1976, that he would be transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged within 90 days pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 3846 . 4 Upon notice, plaintiff promptly sought relief.”
Simpson v. United States, 467 F. Supp. 1122 (S.D.N.Y. 1979). “Plaintiffs Harrison and Gregory Tavano were separated from the National Guard pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 3846 . Plaintiffs Simpson, Saddlemire, Bowman, Annunziato, Lutz, Schnurr, Murphy, Francis Tavano, and Hurley were separated pursuant to 10 U.”
Smith v. United States, 19 Cl. Ct. 19 (Ct. Cl. 1989). “See 10 U.S.C. § 3846 (1982). The correction of his record to reflect a later discharge was simply the AFBCMR’s effort to treat Capt.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.