10 U.S.C. § 456
Civil actions barred
No civil action may be brought against the United States on the basis of the content of geospatial information prepared or disseminated by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1950–1967 · leading case: Spencer v. United States, 102 F. Supp. 774 (Ct. Cl. 1952).
Spencer v. United States, 102 F. Supp. 774 (Ct. Cl. 1952). “796 , 10 U.S.C.A. § 456 , that: "All officers * * * of the Army of the United States, other than the officers * * * of the Regular Army, if called or ordered into the active military service by the Federal Government for extended military service in excess of thirty days, * * *…”
Updike v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 957 (Ct. Cl. 1955). “555 , 557, 10 U.S.C.A. § 456 , amended the National Defense Act, as amended, so as to make section 1 of the National Defense Act, as amended, read as follows: “ * * * Provided further, That all officers, warrant officers, and enlisted men of the Army of the United States, other…”
Capps v. United States, 137 F. Supp. 721 (Ct. Cl. 1956). “557 , as amended, 10 U.S.C.A. § 456 , which is quoted in a note below, 1 intended to give to reserve officers called into active service the same retirement rights as regular officers, and regular officers had long been held to be entitled to retirement pay whether the inception…”
Uhley v. United States, 121 F. Supp. 674 (Ct. Cl. 1954). “557 , as amended, 10 U.S.C.A. § 456 . Under this statute the President issued Executive Order 8099, April 28, 1939, amended by Executive Order 8461, June 28, 1940, Title 3 CFR Cum.”
Lerner v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 247 (Ct. Cl. 1964). “555 , 557, as amended, 10 U.S.C. §456 (1946), which states that any Army officer ordered to extended active military service who suffers disability in line of duty shall receive the same retirement pay, etc.”
Robert J. Cosgriff v. The United States, 387 F.2d 390 (Ct. Cl. 1967). “” Since plaintiff was on extended active military duty when discharged, another relevant provision is 10 U.S.C. § 456 (1946), which states that any Army officer ordered to extended active military service, who suffers disability in line of duty, shall receive the same retirement…”
Wham v. United States, 180 F.2d 38 (D.C. Cir. 1950). “10 U.S.C.A. § 456 ; Army Regulations 40-1025, par.”
Charles C. Harper v. The United States, 310 F.2d 405 (Ct. Cl. 1963). “(1958), and former 10 U.S.C. §§ 456 , 931, 933, 961-965, 971, 34 U.”
Spencer v. United States, 100 F. Supp. 444 (Ct. Cl. 1951). “796 , 10 U.S.C.A. § 456 , that: “All officers * * of the Army of the United States, other than the officers * * * -of the Regular Army, if called or ordered into the active military service by the Federal Government for extended military service in excess of thirty days, * * *…”
Jacobs v. United States, 181 Ct. Cl. 1141 (Ct. Cl. 1967). “This proviso was codified in the 1946 edition of the United States Code as 10 U.S.C. § 456 , reading in part as follows: All officers * * * of the Army of the United States, other than the officers * * * of the Regular Army, if called or ordered into the active military service…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.