10 U.S.C. § 506

Regular components: extension of enlistments during war

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

An enlistment in the Regular Army, Regular Navy, Regular Air Force, Regular Marine Corps, Space Force, or Regular Coast Guard in effect at the beginning of a war, or entered into during a war, unless sooner terminated by the President, continues in effect until six months after the termination of that war.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1983–2005 · leading case: Qualls v. Rumsfeld, 357 F. Supp. 2d 274 (D.D.C. 2005).
Qualls v. Rumsfeld, 357 F. Supp. 2d 274 (D.D.C. 2005). · cites it 2× “Moreover, the Army's decision to extend Quails was not arbitrary or capricious, because Quails was treated like similarly situated enlistees subject to the standard terms of the enlistment contract and statutes that permit involuntary extension, 10 U.S.C. §§ 506 , 12302, 12305;…”
Orville Taylor v. United States, 711 F.2d 1199 (3rd Cir. 1983). “10 U.S.C. §§ 506 , 671a (1976). Prior to the enactment of section 506 as part of the Armed Services Act of 1968, the Secretary of the Navy had discretionary authority to extend enlistments in time of war or national emergency for whatever period he considered necessary.”
Qualls v. Rumsfeld, 357 F. Supp. 2d 274 (D.D.C. 2005). · cites it 2× “Moreover, the Army’s decision to extend Qualls was' not arbitrary or capricious, because Qualls was treated like similarly situated enlistees subject to the standard terms of the enlistment contract and statutes that permit involuntary extension, 10 U.S.C. §§ 506 , 12302, 12305;…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.