10 U.S.C. § 683

Renumbered § 12315]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

[renumbered]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1932–1986 · leading case: O'Hanlon v. United States, 11 Cl. Ct. 192 (Ct. Cl. 1986).
O'Hanlon v. United States, 11 Cl. Ct. 192 (Ct. Cl. 1986). · cites it 5× “§ 1002 (a) and 10 U.S.C. § 683 to support his contention.”
Heidt v. United States, 56 F.2d 559 (5th Cir. 1932). · cites it 2× “In 10 USCA § 683, the words in the Act of June 10, 1922, "Service which is now counted in computing longevity pay" were substituted by those from the Act of June 4, 1920, so as to read: "For officers in the service on June 30, 1922, there shall be included in the computation all…”
Duncan v. Usher, 23 M.J. 29 (1986). “10 U.S.C. § 683 . Usually, a Reserve is not entitled to medical and dental care during periods when he is not on active duty, see 10 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.