10 U.S.C. § 868
Art. 68. Branch offices
The Secretary concerned may direct the Judge Advocate General to establish a branch office with any command. The branch office shall be under an Assistant Judge Advocate General who, with the consent of the Judge Advocate General, may establish a Court of Criminal Appeals with one or more panels. That Assistant Judge Advocate General and any Court of Criminal Appeals established by him may perform for that command under the general supervision of the Judge Advocate General, the respective duties which the Judge Advocate General and a Court of Criminal Appeals established by the Judge Advocate General would otherwise be required to perform as to all cases involving sentences not requiring approval by the President.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1951–1979 · leading case: Howell v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 699 (Ct. Cl. 1958).
Howell v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 699 (Ct. Cl. 1958). “30 (1946), 10U. S. C. § 868. On April 27, 1951, First Lieutenant Martin Frederick Howell, Jr.”
United States v. Lowe, 11 C.M.A. 515 (1960). “] It is immediately apparent that the organic directive providing for the West Coast office does not purport to establish a separate branch office established under Article 68 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 868 , which authorizes establishment of a branch…”
Keown v. United States, 191 F.2d 438 (8th Cir. 1951). “The question here is whether the payment made to the widow 'had effected a legal discharge of the Government’s debt, under the provisions of 10 U.S.C.A. § 868 , as amended. That section, in its material portion, provides: “In the settlement of the accounts of deceased officers…”
Miller v. United States, 133 F. Supp. 1 (N.D. Tex. 1955). “Under the provisions of 10 U.S.C.A. § 868 , the unpaid portion of the salary due a deceased soldier is required to be paid to the mother and father of such decedent, in equal parts.”
Bader v. Adm'r of Vets. Affairs for Dep't of United States Army, 470 F. Supp. 1240 (D.N.J. 1979). “10 U.S.C. § 868 (1946 ed.). See also Keown v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.