10 U.S.C. § 884
Art. 84. Breach of medical quarantine
A prior section 884 was renumbered section 904b of this title.
Section effective on
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases, 1975–2010 · leading case: United States v. Valadez, 5 M.J. 470 (1978).
United States v. Valadez, 5 M.J. 470 (1978). “Accordingly, we relied on Article 84, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 884 , as an expression of public policy by Congress that enlistment contracts for military service by ineligible applicants, procured with knowledge of a government agent, were not in the public interest and void as…”
United States v. Torres, 7 M.J. 102 (1979). “Simply because some other government agent who participated in the recruiting process was innocently deceived by such deliberate fraud in no way obviates its unlawfulness within the meaning of Article 84, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 884 . We believe that allegations of such misconduct by…”
United States v. Russo, 23 C.M.A. 511 (1975). “Article 84, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 884 .”
Willenbring v. Neurauter, 48 M.J. 152 (C.A.A.F. 1998). “Finally, when a person is charged with obtaining a discharge by fraud, a court-martial has jurisdiction over the offense of fraudulent separation in violation of Article 84, UCMJ, 10 USC § 884 ; if convicted of obtaining a fraudulent separation, the individual may be tried in a…”
United States v. Quintal, 10 M.J. 532 (1980). “1 The appellant also presented evidence tending to show that his recruiter engaged in misconduct, possibly constituting a violation of Article 84, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 884 , 2 by inducing the *534 appellant to sign a document stating that the appellant had “successfully completed…”
United States v. Contreras, 69 M.J. 120 (C.A.A.F. 2010). “2 Articles 84, 92, 110, and 115, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 884 , 892, 910, 915 (2006). Under Article 134, UCMJ, the following offenses would also not be considered purely military ones: disloyal statements, jumping from a vessel into the water, and straggling.”
United States v. Hampton, 7 M.J. 284 (1979). “See Article 84, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 884 ; para. 163, Manual, supra.”
United States v. Stone, 8 M.J. 140 (1979). “Except in cases involving jurisdictional questions, this Court has not had many opportunities to definitively rule or comment on the type of recruiter misconduct which technically violates Article 84, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 884 . United States v. Jenkins,…”
United States v. Robbins, 7 M.J. 618 (1978). “Conceivably wanton and willful recruiter negligence, which does not amount to a violation of Article 84, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 884 , but results in the enlistment of an ineligible, will void an enlistment and preclude the Government from relying on a constructive enlistment.”
United States v. Harrison, 5 M.J. 476 (1978). “[ 10 U.S.C. § 884 ], during that process since appellant was not “known to him" to be ineligible for enlistment by reason of age.”
United States v. Ruggiero, 1 M.J. 1089 (1977). “84, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 884 , the resulting enlistment is void as contrary to public policy.”
Hodges v. Brown, 500 F. Supp. 25 (E.D. Pa. 1980). “Article 84, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C.A. § 884 (1956), Unlawful enlistment, appointment, or separation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.