U.S. Code » Title 10 » Subtitle Subtitle A— General Military Law › Part PART II— PERSONNEL › Chapter CHAPTER 47— UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER X— PUNITIVE ARTICLES

10 U.S.C. § 911

Art. 111. Leaving scene of vehicle accident

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)Driver.—Any person subject to this chapter—(1) who is the driver of a vehicle that is involved in an accident that results in personal injury or property damage; and(2) who wrongfully leaves the scene of the accident—(A) without providing assistance to an injured person; or(B) without providing personal identification to others involved in the accident or to appropriate authorities;shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.(b)Senior Passenger.—Any person subject to this chapter—(1) who is a passenger in a vehicle that is involved in an accident that results in personal injury or property damage;(2) who is the superior commissioned or noncommissioned officer of the driver of the vehicle or is the commander of the vehicle; and(3) who wrongfully and unlawfully orders, causes, or permits the driver to leave the scene of the accident—(A) without providing assistance to an injured person; or(B) without providing personal identification to others involved in the accident or to appropriate authorities;shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.(Added Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LX, § 5423, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2947.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 911 was renumbered section 913 of this title.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 143 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1957–2026 · leading case: United States v. Scheurer, 62 M.J. 100 (C.A.A.F. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Scheurer, 62 M.J. 100 (C.A.A.F. 2005). · cites it 6× “16 10 U.S.C. § 911 (2000). 17 10 U.S.C. § 944 (2000).”
United States v. Peters, 74 M.J. 31 (C.A.A.F. 2015). · cites it 2× “A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted Appellant, based on mixed pleas, of drunken operation of a vehicle, causing injury because of that drunken operation, two specifications of involuntary manslaughter, and aggravated assault in violation of…”
United States v. Miller, 58 M.J. 266 (C.A.A.F. 2003). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to his pleas, he was convicted of drunk driving and one specification each of wrongful distribution and wrongful possession of methamphetamine in violation of Articles 111 and 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 911 , 912a (2000),…”
United States v. Thomas, 65 M.J. 132 (C.A.A.F. 2007). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, Appellant pled guilty at a special court-martial to physically controlling a vehicle while impaired by marijuana and wrongfully introducing marijuana onto an installation used by the armed forces, in violation of Articles 111 and 112a, UCMJ, 10…”
United States v. Green, 55 M.J. 76 (C.A.A.F. 2001). · cites it 2× “111(2), UCMJ, 10 USC § 911 (2) (making it an offense to drive with a blood alcohol level of "0.”
United States v. Clayton, 67 M.J. 283 (C.A.A.F. 2009). · cites it 2× “martial with members convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of use of marijuana, possession of marijuana, two specifications of obstruction of justice, possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, reckless driving, assault on a law enforcement officer, and fleeing…”
United States v. Moran, 65 M.J. 178 (C.A.A.F. 2007). “Contrary to his pleas, a general court-martial composed of officer members convicted Appellant of drunk driving, wrongful distribution of cocaine, separate specifications of wrongful use of ecstasy, cocaine, and LSD, and obstruction of justice in violation of Articles 111, 112a,…”
United States v. Kerr, 51 M.J. 401 (C.A.A.F. 1999). “A general court-martial composed of members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of drunk driving; indecent assault; and conduct unbecoming an officer by engaging in that conduct, in violation of Articles 111, 134, and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 911…”
United States v. Pomarleau, 57 M.J. 351 (C.A.A.F. 2002). · cites it 2× “A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of two specifications of drunk driving and two specifications of involuntary manslaughter, in violation of Articles 111 and 119, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ),…”
State v. Ivie, 961 P.2d 941 (Wash. 1998). · cites it 2× “operation of a vehicle" in violation of 10 U.S.C. § 911 (1994) while the present Washington prosecution is for "driving under the influence" in violation of RCW 46.”
State v. Ivie, 136 Wash. 2d 173 (Wash. 1998). · cites it 2× “operation of a vehicle” in violation of 10 U.S.C. § 911 (1994) while the present Washington prosecution is for “driving under the influence” in violation of RCW 46.”
United States v. Mullens, 29 M.J. 398 (1990). “Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of drunk driving, two specifications of sodomy on his minor son, *399 one specification each of indecent acts with his minor son and with his minor daughter, and communicating a threat, in violation of Articles 111, 125, and 134,…”
Show all 143 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.