Notes of Decisions
Cited in
16
cases (
14 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case:
United States v. Bygrave, 46 M.J. 491 (C.A.A.F. 1997).
United States v. Bygrave, 46 M.J. 491 (C.A.A.F. 1997).
“114 (dueling), 120 (carnal knowledge), and 134 (bigamy), UCMJ, 10 USC §§ 914 , 920, and 934, respectively.”
United States v. MAEBANE, No. 202200228 (N.M.C.C.A. May 3, 2024).
· cites it 2× “s against Appellant did not exist; (4) the military judge erroneously denied trial defense counsel’s continuance request that was neces- sary to ensure a defense expert consultant was present at trial; (5) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support a…”
United States v. Maebane, No. 24-0196/NA (C.A.A.F. Sept. 18, 2025).
· cites it 2× “A panel of officers and enlisted members at a general court-martial convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification of reckless endangerment and one specification of involuntary manslaughter, in violation of Articles 114 and 119, Uniform Code of Military Justice…”
United States v. Addis, No. 201900224 (N.M.C.C.A. Dec. 4, 2019).
“201900224 Modified Entry of Judgment Charge IV: Violation of Article 114, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 914 . Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.”
United States v. Stefanek, No. 39895 (A.F.C.C.A. May 5, 2021).
“§ 886 , 1 and one specification of unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon into his place of work in violation of Article 114, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 914 . Appellant was also convicted, contrary to his pleas, of one specification of kidnapping in violation of Article 125, UCMJ, 10 U.”
United States v. Halter, No. S32666 (f rev) (A.F.C.C.A. May 4, 2022).
“) (2016 MCM); and one specification of reckless endangerment, two specifications of assault upon an intimate partner, and an additional specification of assault consummated by a battery, in violation of Articles 114, 128b, and 128, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 914 , 928b, 928, Manual for…”
United States v. Dickson, No. 20050 (A.F.C.C.A. Feb. 10, 2022).
“As a result, the members acquitted Appellant of one charge with one specification of wrong- ful and willful discharge of a firearm, to wit: while driving on a motorway under cir- cumstances such as to endanger human life, in violation of Article 114, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 914 .…”
United States v. Halter, No. S32666 (A.F.C.C.A. Jan. 6, 2022).
“) (2016 MCM); one specification of reckless en- dangerment, two specifications of assault upon an intimate partner, and an additional specification of assault consummated by a battery, in violation of Articles 114, 128b, and 128, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 914 , 928b, 928, Manual for…”
United States v. Reimers, No. 40141 (A.F.C.C.A. Jan. 26, 2023).
“§ 912a;2 one charge and one specification of unlawfully carrying a con- cealed weapon in violation of Article 114, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 914 ; one charge and two specifications of federal firearms offenses in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.”
Bell v. Dep't of the Navy Off. of the Judge Advocate Gen., No. 4:19-cv-02221, 2021 WL 1143852 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 25, 2021).
“He claims 10 U.S.C. § 914 , the Endangerment Offenses section of the Uniform Code of Military Justice “[s]ays you can’t do what you have done to nearly 900,000 Marines and their families and after 40 years in court just sweep them all under the carpet by saying, ‘YOU CAN GET…”
United States v. AVILA, No. 202300249 (N.M.C.C.A. Feb. 20, 2025).
“Charge III: Violation of Article 114, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 914 . Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.”
United States v. Caswell, No. 23035 (A.F.C.C.A. Mar. 18, 2025).
“________________________ PERCLE, Judge: A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted Appellant, con- trary to his pleas, of one specification of unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon, in violation of Article 114, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 914 , and one specifica- tion…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.