10 U.S.C. § 922
Art. 122. Robbery
Any person subject to this chapter who takes anything of value from the person or in the presence of another, against his will, by means of force or violence or fear of immediate or future injury to his person or property or to the person or property of a relative or member of his family or of anyone in his company at the time of the robbery, is guilty of robbery and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 143
cases, 1957–2018 · leading case: State v. Morley, 952 P.2d 167 (Wash. 1998).
State v. Morley, 952 P.2d 167 (Wash. 1998). “article 122, 10 U.S.C. § 922 . Article 122 sets out the crime of robbery, and the elements of the crime are as follows: *607 Any person .”
United States v. Baer, 53 M.J. 235 (C.A.A.F. 2000). “FOOTNOTES : 1 Violations of Articles 122, 128, 81, 134, and 118, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 922 , 928, 881, 934, and 918, respectively.”
United States v. Billings, 61 M.J. 163 (C.A.A.F. 2005). “§ 881 (2000)), conspiracy to commit robbery (in violation of Article 81), robbery with a firearm (in violation of Article 122, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 922 (2000)), two specifications of assault consummated by a battery (in violation of Article 128, UCMJ, 10 U.”
United States v. Snelling, 14 M.J. 267 (1982). “OPINION OF THE COURT COOK, Judge: Tried by general court-martial, military judge alone, the accused was convicted, despite his pleas, 1 of robbery, in violation of Article 122, Uniform Code of Military Jus *268 tice, 10 U.S.C. § 922 . The approved sentence extends to a…”
United States v. Carson, 57 M.J. 410 (C.A.A.F. 2002). “C § 890 (1) (assaulting a superior commissioned officer by "strik[ing]" that officer); Article 91(1), UCMJ, 10 USC § 891 (1) (insubordinate conduct toward warrant, noncommissioned, or petty officer by "strik[ing] or assault[ing]" the victim); Articles 118 and 119, UCMJ, 10 USC…”
United States v. Allen, 17 M.J. 126 (1984). “Appellant was tried by officer members for robbery and assault consummated by a battery, in violation of Articles 122 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 922 and 928, respectively. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty as charged and was sentenced to be…”
Muir v. State, 517 A.2d 1105 (Md. 1986). “" [2] Article 122 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 922 (1956) provides that any person subject to the Code "who with intent to steal takes anything of value from the person or in the presence of another, against his will, by means of force or violence or fear…”
United States v. Smart, 21 M.J. 15 (1985). “Opinion of the Court EVERETT, Chief Judge: Pursuant to appellant’s guilty pleas, a general court-martial sitting at Darmstadt, Federal Republic of Germany, found him guilty of two specifications of robbery, in violation of Article 122, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C.…”
United States v. Bolkan, 55 M.J. 425 (C.A.A.F. 2001). “Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by officer members of the robbery of JS, in violation of Article 122, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 USC § 922 . The convening authority approved the sentence of a bad-conduct discharge.”
United States v. Gray, 7 M.J. 296 (1979). “Opinion of the Court PER CURIAM: At the appellant’s court-martial upon 7 specifications alleging robbery, in violation of Article 122, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 922 , 1 the issue of identi *297 fication of the appellant as one of the perpetrators developed as…”
United States v. Thomas, 11 M.J. 388 (1981). “Winters, in violation of Article 122 of the Code, 10 U.S.C. § 922 . 1 He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for 4 years, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances.”
United States v. Hickson, 22 M.J. 146 (1986). “122 and 108, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 922 and 908, respectively. The dissent’s view there was that Congress had intended to permit conviction only for one of these offenses where there was a single transaction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.