Notes of Decisions
Cited in
1,098
cases (
197 in the last 5 years), 1957–2026 · leading case:
Jones v. United States, 526 U.S. 227 (1999).
Jones v. United States, 526 U.S. 227 (1999).
· cites it 2× “, 10 U. S. C. § 928 (b)(2) (assault by a member of the armed forces); 18 U.”
United States v. Bowen, 76 M.J. 83 (C.A.A.F. 2017).
· cites it 2× “MB, and one specification of assault consummated by battery upon a fellow airman, Senior Airman (SrA) BB, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 928 (2012). 2 The panel acquitted Bowen of two specifications of assault with a dangerous…”
United States v. Simmons, 59 M.J. 485 (C.A.A.F. 2004).
· cites it 4× “Simmons was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members and was convicted of assault consummated by a battery and conduct unbecoming an officer and gentleman in violation of Articles 128 and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 928 and 933…”
United States v. Warner, 62 M.J. 114 (C.A.A.F. 2005).
· cites it 3× “2 10 U.S.C. § 928 (2000). 3 The members sentenced Appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for eighteen months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to pay grade E-1.”
United States v. Joseph, 37 M.J. 392 (C.M.A. 1993).
· cites it 5× “Opinion of the Court COX, Judge: A military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon or other means or force likely to produce death or grievous bodily harm, inter alia, in violation…”
United States v. Rosario, 76 M.J. 114 (C.A.A.F. 2017).
“§ 920 (2012), and one specification of assault consummated by a battery in violation of Article 128, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 928 (2012). Appellant was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to grade E-l.”
United States v. Ahern, 76 M.J. 194 (C.A.A.F. 2017).
“3136 (2006)); one specification of assault consummated by battery, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 928 (2000); three specifications of indecent acts upon a child, and one specification of child endangerment, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.”
Middendorf v. Henry, 425 U.S. 25 (1976).
· cites it 2× “128, UCMJ, 10 U. S. C. § 928 , had been ordered to stand trial at summary courts-martial which had not been convened.”
United States v. Vaughan, 58 M.J. 29 (C.A.A.F. 2003).
· cites it 2× “She was convicted of three specifications of assault and one charge of “child neglect,” in violation of Articles 128 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 928 and 934, respectively. Appellant contested one of the assault specifications and…”
United States v. Doss, 57 M.J. 182 (C.A.A.F. 2002).
· cites it 2× “A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of assault with a dangerous weapon and assault consummated by a battery, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 USC § 928 . The military judge also…”
Solorio v. United States, 483 U.S. 435 (1987).
· cites it 2× “128, 10 U. S. C. § 928 , and 1 specification alleging attempted rape in violation of Art.”
United States v. Elespuru, 73 M.J. 326 (C.A.A.F. 2014).
· cites it 2× “3136 (2006)); Charge I, Specification 3, divers occasions of wrongful sexual contact, in violation of Article 120, UCMJ; and Charge II, Specification 1, assault consummated by a battery, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 928 (2006). Consistent with his pleas,…”
10 U.S.C. § 928(a)(3): 1 case
10 U.S.C. § 928(b): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.