10 U.S.C. § 941
Art. 141. Status
There is a court of record known as the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The court is established under article I of the Constitution. The court is located for administrative purposes only in the Department of Defense.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Edmond v. United States, 520 U.S. 651 (1997).
Edmond v. United States, 520 U.S. 651 (1997). “[2] Article 141 of the UCMJ, 10 U. S. C. § 941 ,states that the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces "is established under article I of the Constitution," and "is located for administrative purposes only in the Department of Defense.”
Ctr. for Constitutional Rights v. United States, 72 M.J. 126 (C.A.A.F. 2013). “14; 10 U.S.C. § 941 ; see generally Weiss v. United States, 510 U.”
Ortiz v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2165 (2018). “The CAAF is a “court of record” composed of five civilian judges, 10 U. S. C. §941 , which must review certain weighty cases and may review others.”
United States v. Leak, 61 M.J. 234 (C.A.A.F. 2005). “2 Article 141, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 941 (2000) (“There is a court of record known as the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.”
Loving v. United States, 62 M.J. 235 (C.A.A.F. 2005). “Article 141, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 941 (2000) ("There is a court of record known as the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.”
Clinton v. Goldsmith, 526 U.S. 529 (1999). “14; 10 U. S. C. § 941 ; see generally Weiss *534 v.”
Peter Kuretski v. Comm'r of IRS, 755 F.3d 929 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “” 10 U.S.C. § 941 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces); 26 U.”
Randolph v. HV & United States, 76 M.J. 27 (C.A.A.F. 2017). “, dissenting), that we are nonetheless bound to apply, and thus extend, a line of cases insisting that we have interlocutory jurisdiction under Article 67, UCMJ, to this case, even though the statu- tory text supports no such jurisdiction.”
United States v. Weiss, 36 M.J. 224 (1992). “In 1969 the provision was amended to read: “There is a United States Court of Military Appeals established under article I of the Constitution of the United States____” Finally, in Article 141, 10 USC § 941 (1989) Congress described the Court’s status as follows: “There is a…”
In re the Fee Agreement of Cox, 10 Vet. App. 361 (Vet. App. 1997). “Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces), also a Court established under Article I, see 10 U.S.C. § 941 , possesses AWA authority and that “the [AWA] applies by its terms to any ‘courts established by Act of Congress’ ” (emphasis added)); Anderson v.”
Gary Ozenne v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 818 F.3d 514 (9th Cir. 2016). “§ 158 (b)(1) with 10 U.S.C.A § 941 (“There is a court of record known as the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.”
Salter v. United States Bankr. Court for the Cent. Dist. of California (In Re Salter), 279 B.R. 278 (9th Cir. BAP 2002). “” 10 U.S.C. § 941 . 3 . Before 1994, each circuit court had discretion whether to create a BAP to hear appeals from some or all districts in the circuit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.