11 U.S.C. § 1207
Property of the estate
For repeal of section effective
Permanent reenactment of section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 51
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2021 · leading case: Knudsen v. Internal Revenue Serv., 581 F.3d 696 (8th Cir. 2009).
Knudsen v. Internal Revenue Serv., 581 F.3d 696 (8th Cir. 2009). “Additionally, even though there is no "separate taxable entity" in a Chapter 12 case, an "estate" still exists, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1207 (a), which provides: § 1207.”
Ricky Wayne Bracewell v. Walter W. Kelley, 454 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2006). “” 11 U.S.C. § 1207 (a)(1). *1240 If § 541(a)(1) did not generally limit the property of the estate to that which existed at the time of filing, there would be no reason for § 1207(a)(1) to extend the cutoff point to the earlier of the closing, dismissal, or conversion date in…”
Off. Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. R.F. Lafferty & Co., Inc. Cogen Sklar, L.L.P, 267 F.3d 340 (3rd Cir. 2001). “11 U.S.C. §§ 1207 , 1306. “Such actions .”
In Re Juan O. Plata, in Re Catalina Plata, Debtors. Peter H. Arkison, Tr. v. Juan O. Plata, Catalina Plata, 958 F.2d 918 (9th Cir. 1992). “11 U.S.C. § 1207 (a)(1), (2). Debtors were entitled to, and did, remain in possession of their estate and continued to operate their family farming business.”
In Re: Wayne E. Bell, Jr., Debtor. Wayne E. Bell, Jr. v. Deborah Bell, 225 F.3d 203 (2d Cir. 2000). “” 11 U.S.C. § 1207 (a) (emphasis added). Under this provision, courts held that the post-conversion estate under Chapter 7 included the property acquired by the debtor after filing the petition under Chapter 12 but before conversion.”
Bracewell v. Kelley (In Re Bracewell), 322 B.R. 698 (M.D. Ga. 2005). “Regarding the first payment, the court held that the crop disaster payments were “proceeds” of property of the estate by virtue of 11 U.S.C.A. § 1207 . Id. at *4 . Section 1207 states, in part: “Property of the estate includes, in addition to the property specified in section…”
In re Thorpe, 563 B.R. 576 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2017). “commencement of the case, see 11 U.S.C. § 1207 (a), but the claim existed independent of the bankruptcy case and did not involve any rights created by the Bankruptcy Code.”
In Re Mikkelsen Farms, Inc., 74 B.R. 280 (Bankr. D. Or. 1987). “See, 11 U.S.C. § 1207 ; 11 U.S.C. § 1306 . That section is § 1207 which states: (a) Property of the estate includes, in addition to the property specified in section 541 of this title— (1) all property of the kind specified in such section that the debtor acquires after the…”
Stevens v. Downing, Alexander, Wood & Ilg, 693 N.W.2d 532 (Neb. 2005). “Thus, under a chapter 12 bankruptcy proceeding, when a cause of action accrued to a debtor is immaterial to the determination of whether the claim is part of the bankruptcy estate, so long as the case has not been closed, dismissed, or converted to a chapter 7 bankruptcy.”
In Re Mid-City Parking, Inc., 332 B.R. 798 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2005). “Because debtors-in-possession under Chapters 11, 12, and 13 generally retain possession of estate property, see 11 U.S.C. §§ 1207 (b), 1306(b), 1106(a)(1), 1107(a), 1108, they are also considered to be in control of lawsuits belonging to the bankruptcy estate under § 541(a) and,…”
In Re Brandenburger, 145 B.R. 624 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1992). “Nail further opined that under 11 U.S.C. § 1207 an estate in Chapter 12 exists until the case is closed, dismissed, or converted, whichever comes first.”
Dawson v. Thomas (In Re Dawson), 411 B.R. 1 (D.D.C. 2008). “In chapters 12 and 13, the debtor generally remains in possession of the property of the estate, 11 U.S.C. §§ 1207 (b) and 1306(b), and a plan is generally funded via payments from the debtor.”
— 11 U.S.C. § 1207(a) — 2 cases
Knudsen v. Internal Revenue Serv., 581 F.3d 696 (8th Cir. 2009). “Additionally, even though there is no "separate taxable entity" in a Chapter 12 case, an "estate" still exists, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1207 (a), which provides: § 1207.”
In Re Schilke, 379 B.R. 899 (Bankr. D. Neb. 2007).
— 11 U.S.C. § 1207(a)(1) — 1 case
Rogers v. Freeman (In re Freeman), 527 B.R. 780 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2015).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.