11 U.S.C. § 1301

Stay of action against codebtor

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 11 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, after the order for relief under this chapter, a creditor may not act, or commence or continue any civil action, to collect all or any part of a consumer debt of the debtor from any individual that is liable on such debt with the debtor, or that secured such debt, unless—(1) such individual became liable on or secured such debt in the ordinary course of such individual’s business; or(2) the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to a case under chapter 7 or 11 of this title.(b) A creditor may present a negotiable instrument, and may give notice of dishonor of such an instrument.(c) On request of a party in interest and after notice and a hearing, the court shall grant relief from the stay provided by subsection (a) of this section with respect to a creditor, to the extent that—(1) as between the debtor and the individual protected under subsection (a) of this section, such individual received the consideration for the claim held by such creditor;(2) the plan filed by the debtor proposes not to pay such claim; or(3) such creditor’s interest would be irreparably harmed by continuation of such stay.(d) Twenty days after the filing of a request under subsection (c)(2) of this section for relief from the stay provided by subsection (a) of this section, such stay is terminated with respect to the party in interest making such request, unless the debtor or any individual that is liable on such debt with the debtor files and serves upon such party in interest a written objection to the taking of the proposed action.(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2645; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §§ 313, 524, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 355, 388.)Historical and Revision Noteslegislative statements

Section 1301 of the House amendment is identical with the provision contained in section 1301 of the House bill and adopted by the Senate amendment. Section 1301(c)(1) indicates that a basis for lifting the stay is that the debtor did not receive consideration for the claim by the creditor, or in other words, the debtor is really the “codebtor.” As with other sections in title 11, the standard of receiving consideration is a general rule, but where two co-debtors have agreed to share liabilities in a different manner than profits it is the individual who does not ultimately bear the liability that is protected by the stay under section 1301.

senate report no. 95–989

Subsection (a) automatically stays the holder of a claim based on a consumer debt of the chapter 13 debtor from acting or proceeding in any way, except as authorized pursuant to subsections (b) and (c), against an individual or the property of an individual liable with the chapter 13 debtor, unless such codebtor became liable in the ordinary course of his business, or unless the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to another chapter.

Under the terms of the agreement with the codebtor who is not in bankruptcy, the creditor has a right to collect all payments to the extent they are not made by the debtor at the time they are due. To the extent to which a chapter 13 plan does not propose to pay a creditor his claims, the creditor may obtain relief from the court from the automatic stay and collect such claims from the codebtor. Conversely, a codebtor obtains the benefit of any payments made to the creditor under the plan. If a debtor defaults on scheduled payments under the plan, then the codebtor would be liable for the remaining deficiency; otherwise, payments not made under the plan may never be made by the codebtor. The obligation of the codebtor to make the creditor whole at the time payments are due remains.

The automatic stay under this section pertains only to the collection of a consumer debt, defined by section 101(7) of this title to mean a debt incurred by an individual primarily for a personal, family, or household purpose. Therefore, not all debts owed by a chapter 13 debtor will be subject to the stay of the codebtor, particularly those business debts incurred by an individual with regular income, as defined by section 101(24) of this title, engaged in business, that is permitted by virtue of section 109(b) and section 1304 to obtain chapter 13 relief.

Subsection (b) excepts the giving of notice of dishonor of a negotiable instrument from the reach of the codebtor stay.

Under subsection (c), if the codebtor has property out of which the creditor’s claim can be satisfied, the court can grant relief from the stay absent the transfer of a security interest in that property by the codebtor to the creditor. Correspondingly, if there is reasonable cause to believe that property is about to be disposed of by the codebtor which could be used to satisfy his obligation to the creditor, the court should lift the stay to allow the creditor to perfect his rights against such property. Likewise, if property is subject to rapid depreciation or decrease in value the stay should be lifted to allow the creditor to protect his rights to reach such property. Otherwise, the creditor’s interest would be irreparably harmed by such stay. Property which could be used to satisfy the claim could be disposed of or encumbered and placed beyond the reach of the creditor. The creditor should be allowed to protect his rights to reach property which could satisfy his claim and prevent its erosion in value, disposal, or encumbrance.

house report no. 95–595

This section is new. It is designed to protect a debtor operating under a chapter 13 individual repayment plan case by insulating him from indirect pressures from his creditors exerted through friends or relatives that may have cosigned an obligation of the debtor. The protection is limited, however, to ensure that the creditor involved does not lose the benefit of the bargain he made for a cosigner. He is entitled to full compensation, including any interest, fees, and costs provided for by the agreement under which the debtor obtained his loan. The creditor is simply required to share with other creditors to the extent that the debtor will repay him under the chapter 13 plan. The creditor is delayed, but his substantive rights are not affected.

Subsection (a) is the operative subsection. It stays action by a creditor after an order for relief under chapter 13. The creditor may not act, or commence or continue any civil action, to collect all or any part of a consumer debt of the debtor from any individual that is liable on such debt with the debtor, or that has secured the debt, unless the individual became liable or secured the debt in the ordinary course of his business, or the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to chapter 7 or 11.

Subsection (b) permits the creditor, notwithstanding the stay, to present a negotiable instrument and to give notice of dishonor of the instrument, in order to preserve his substantive rights against the codebtor as required by applicable nonbankruptcy law.

Subsection (c) requires the court to grant relief from the stay in certain circumstances. The court must grant relief to the extent that the debtor does not propose to pay, under the plan, the amount owed to the creditor. The court must also grant relief to the extent that the debtor was really the codebtor in the transaction, that is, to the extent that the nondebtor party actually received the consideration for the claim held by the creditor. Finally, the court must grant relief to the extent that the creditor’s interest would be irreparably harmed by the stay, for example, where the codebtor filed bankruptcy himself, or threatened to leave the locale, or lost his job.

Editorial NotesAmendments

1984—Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 98–353, § 524, inserted “continuation of” after “by”.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 98–353, § 313, added subsec. (d).

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 610 cases (72 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: In re Whitlock-Young, 571 B.R. 795 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2017).
In re Whitlock-Young, 571 B.R. 795 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2017). · cites it 8× “55] (the “Response”); (5) Debtor’s Reply in Support of a Finding That Creditor Planet Home Funding Violated the Co-Debtor’s Stay under 11 U.S.C. § 1301 [Dkt. No. 58] (the “Reply”); (6) [Scheduling] Order [Dkt.”
In Re Abdul Muhaimin, 343 B.R. 159 (Bankr. D. Md. 2006). · cites it 6× “§ 362 (a) and the co-Debtor stay under 11 U.S.C. § 1301 (a) as to Mrs. Muhaimin’s husband, Lawrence Muhaimin.”
Ransom v. FIA Card Servs., N. A., 131 S. Ct. 716 (2011). · cites it 2× “11 U. S. C. §1301 et seq. To deter mine how much income the debtor is capable of paying, Chapter 13 uses a statutory formula known as the “means test.”
Pressimone v. Internal Revenue Serv. (In Re Pressimone), 39 B.R. 240 (N.D.N.Y. 1984). · cites it 8× “Pressimone, a stenographer for the State Tax Department, filed a petition under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 1301 et seq. on November 15, 1982.”
Toibb v. Radloff, 501 U.S. 157 (1991). · cites it 2× “*170 For these reasons, notwithstanding the excerpt from the Senate Report on which the Court relies, I would, in accordance with the clear statement in the House Report, read the statute as a whole to limit Chapter 11 relief to business debtors. I therefore respectfully dissent.”
Smith v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., 845 F.3d 256 (7th Cir. 2016). · cites it 4× “Appellant Smith initiated an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court, alleging that appellees had violated the co-debtor stay of 11 U.S.C. § 1301 . The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment for appellant Smith, holding that Capital One’s lawsuit against Smith’s husband…”
In Re Lemma, 394 B.R. 315 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2008). · cites it 4× “Relief From the Codebtor Stay Under 11 U.S.C. § 1301 (c)(1) The Bank seeks relief from the co-debt- or stay imposed by section 1301(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, claiming that such relief is warranted under sections 1301(c)(1) and (c)(2).”
Aspen Skiing Co. v. Cherrett (In Re Cherrett), 873 F.3d 1060 (9th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “2000) (“The issue presented here, whether federal income taxes should be considered consumer debt for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 1301 , is a question of law, which we review de novo.”
In Re Bonanno, 78 B.R. 52 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987). · cites it 6× “The issue presented in this case is whether a creditor may obtain relief from the chapter 13 co-debtor stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1301 (c)(2) after the entry of an unappealed order of confirmation of a chapter 13 plan which contains an express provision barring the creditor…”
Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson, 137 S. Ct. 1407 (2017). “1 — i In March 2014, Aleida Johnson, the respondent, filed for personal bankruptcy under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code (or Code), 11 U.S.C. § 1301 et seq., in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Alabama.”
Ho v. Dowell (In Re Ho), 274 B.R. 867 (9th Cir. BAP 2002). · cites it 2× “11 U.S.C. §§ 1301 & 1306(b). Second, at the time of confirmation, the debtor's § 109(e) eligibility for chapter 13 relief is logically subsumed within the essential elements for confirmation that the Bankruptcy Code be complied with and that the plan be proposed in good faith…”
In Re Harris, 16 B.R. 371 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1982). · cites it 9× “In this opinion the court will deal only with the questions which arise under 11 U.S.C. § 1301 . 1 The creditor filed a claim for a balance which is subject to change with addition of late charges and interest on payments not made.”
— 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a) — 3 cases
In Re Steward, 338 B.R. 654 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2006).
Jeffries v. Herr (D. Maryland 2024).
Rapp v. Schmidt (Haw. App. 2025).
— 11 U.S.C. § 1301(a)(2) — 1 case
Rapp v. Schmidt (Haw. App. 2025).
— 11 U.S.C. § 1301(c)(2) — 2 cases
In Re Robinson Ranch, Inc., 75 B.R. 606 (Bankr. D. Mont. 1987).
In Re Welch, 347 B.R. 247 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.