11 U.S.C. § 552

Postpetition effect of security interest

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 11 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, property acquired by the estate or by the debtor after the commencement of the case is not subject to any lien resulting from any security agreement entered into by the debtor before the commencement of the case.(b)(1) Except as provided in sections 363, 506(c), 522, 544, 545, 547, and 548 of this title, if the debtor and an entity entered into a security agreement before the commencement of the case and if the security interest created by such security agreement extends to property of the debtor acquired before the commencement of the case and to proceeds, products, offspring, or profits of such property, then such security interest extends to such proceeds, products, offspring, or profits acquired by the estate after the commencement of the case to the extent provided by such security agreement and by applicable nonbankruptcy law, except to any extent that the court, after notice and a hearing and based on the equities of the case, orders otherwise.(2) Except as provided in sections 363, 506(c), 522, 544, 545, 547, and 548 of this title, and notwithstanding section 546(b) of this title, if the debtor and an entity entered into a security agreement before the commencement of the case and if the security interest created by such security agreement extends to property of the debtor acquired before the commencement of the case and to amounts paid as rents of such property or the fees, charges, accounts, or other payments for the use or occupancy of rooms and other public facilities in hotels, motels, or other lodging properties, then such security interest extends to such rents and such fees, charges, accounts, or other payments acquired by the estate after the commencement of the case to the extent provided in such security agreement, except to any extent that the court, after notice and a hearing and based on the equities of the case, orders otherwise.(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2602; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, § 466, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 380; Pub. L. 103–394, title II, § 214(a), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4126; Pub. L. 109–8, title XII, § 1204(2), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 194.)Historical and Revision Noteslegislative statements

Section 552(a) is derived from the House bill and the alternative provision in the Senate amendment is rejected. Section 552(b) represents a compromise between the House bill and the Senate amendment. Proceeds coverage, but not after acquired property clauses, are valid under title 11. The provision allows the court to consider the equities in each case. In the course of such consideration the court may evaluate any expenditures by the estate relating to proceeds and any related improvement in position of the secured party. Although this section grants a secured party a security interest in proceeds, product, offspring, rents, or profits, the section is explicitly subject to other sections of title 11. For example, the trustee or debtor in possession may use, sell, or lease proceeds, product, offspring, rents or profits under section 363.

senate report no. 95–989

Under the Uniform Commercial Code, article 9, creditors may take security interests in after-acquired property. Section 552 governs the effect of such a prepetition security interest in postpetition property. It applies to all security interests as defined in section 101(37) of the bankruptcy code, not only to U.C.C. security interests.

As a general rule, if a security agreement is entered into before the commencement of the case, then property that the estate acquires is not subject to the security interest created by a provision in the security agreement extending the security interest to after-acquired property. Subsection (b) provides an important exception consistent with the Uniform Commercial Code. If the security agreement extends to proceeds, product, offspring, rents, or profits of the property in question, then the proceeds would continue to be subject to the security interest pursuant to the terms of the security agreement and provisions of applicable law, except to the extent that where the estate acquires the proceeds at the expense of other creditors holding unsecured claims, the expenditure resulted in an improvement in the position of the secured party.

The exception covers the situation where raw materials, for example, are converted into inventory, or inventory into accounts, at some expense to the estate, thus depleting the fund available for general unsecured creditors, but is limited to the benefit inuring to the secured party thereby. Situations in which the estate incurs expense in simply protecting collateral are governed by 11 U.S.C. 506(c). In ordinary circumstances, the risk of loss in continued operations will remain with the estate.

house report no. 95–595

Under the Uniform Commercial Code, Article 9, creditors may take security interests in after-acquired property. This section governs the effect of such a prepetition security interest in postpetition property. It applies to all security interests as defined in section 101 of the bankruptcy code, not only to U.C.C. security interests.

As a general rule, if a security agreement is entered into before the case, then property that the estate acquires is not subject to the security interest created by the security agreement. Subsection (b) provides the only exception. If the security agreement extends to proceeds, product, offspring, rents, or profits of property that the debtor had before the commencement of the case, then the proceeds, etc., continue to be subject to the security interest, except to the extent that the estate acquired the proceeds to the prejudice of other creditors holding unsecured claims. “Extends to” as used here would include an automatically arising security interest in proceeds, as permitted under the 1972 version of the Uniform Commercial Code, as well as an interest in proceeds specifically designated, as required under the 1962 Code or similar statutes covering property not covered by the Code. “Prejudice” is not intended to be a broad term here, but is designed to cover the situation where the estate expends funds that result in an increase in the value of collateral. The exception is to cover the situation where raw materials, for example, are converted into inventory, or inventory into accounts, at some expense to the estate, thus depleting the fund available for general unsecured creditors. The term “proceeds” is not limited to the technical definition of that term in the U.C.C., but covers any property into which property subject to the security interest is converted.

Editorial NotesAmendments

2005—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 109–8 substituted “products” for “product” in two places.

1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–394 designated existing provisions as par. (1), struck out “rents,” after “offspring,” in two places, and added par. (2).

1984—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–353 inserted “522,” after “506(c),”, substituted “an entity entered” for “a secured party enter”, and substituted “except to any extent” for “except to the extent”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–394 effective Oct. 22, 1994, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before Oct. 22, 1994, see section 702 of Pub. L. 103–394, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 542 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Peaje Invs. LLC v. Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for P.R. (In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for P.R.), 899 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2018).
Peaje Invs. LLC v. Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for P.R. (In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for P.R.), 899 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2018). · cites it 3× “First, Code section 552(a) establishes a general rule, subject to several exceptions not relevant here, see 11 U.S.C. § 552 (b), that property acquired by the debtor after the commencement of the bankruptcy case "is not subject to any lien resulting from any security agreement…”
Great-West Life & Annuity Assurance Co. v. Parke Imperial Canton, Ltd., 177 B.R. 843 (N.D. Ohio 1994). · cites it 16× “DECISION OF THE COURT BELOW In its September 1, 1993 Memorandum of Decision and Order, the Bankruptcy Court held (1) that Great-West had no security interest in the postpetition hotel room revenues and other operating revenues of Parke Imperial because those revenues did not…”
In Re: Tower Air, Inc., Debtor Charles A. Stanziale, Jr., Chapter 7 Tr. of Tower Air, Inc. v. Finova Capital Corp., 397 F.3d 191 (3rd Cir. 2005). · cites it 5× “The Trustee also appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s refusal to grant him equitable relief under 11 U.S.C. § 552 (b). The decision whether to apply the equitable exception under § 552(b) is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
In Re Figearo, 79 B.R. 914 (Bankr. D. Nev. 1987). · cites it 9× “1985), the court concluded that the language of 11 U.S.C. § 552 (b) does not mean that a prepetition security interest may never extend to property acquired by a trustee in a preference action.”
In Re Kruse, 35 B.R. 958 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1983). · cites it 6× “The court stated: The Debtors’ reliance of [sic] 11 U.S.C. § 552 is also untenable. Section 552(a) permits the avoidance of liens of property acquired by the estate or by a debtor after the commencement of a case.”
In Re Patio & Porch Sys., Inc., 194 B.R. 569 (Bankr. D. Md. 1996). · cites it 11× “eivable; (2) Does Maryland state law create any special bars preventing a contractor from obtaining an interest in a home improvement contract prior to fully performing the contract; (3) Does a security interest in accounts receivable cover contract claims that have not yet been…”
Barber v. McCord Auto Supply, Inc. (In Re Pearson Indus., Inc.), 178 B.R. 753 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 1995). · cites it 5× “The second issue, which involves the interpretation of 11 U.S.C. § 552 (a), is whether any property recovered by the trustee under his avoiding powers remains subject to any security interest that was enforceable against the transferee of the avoided transfer.”
Cadle Co. v. Jan Richard Schlichtmann, 267 F.3d 14 (1st Cir. 2001). · cites it 4× “See 11 U.S.C. § 552 . “Its purpose is to prevent a creditor’s pre-petition security interest in ‘after-acquired property’ .”
In Re Corpus Christi Hotel Partners, Ltd., 133 B.R. 850 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 1991). · cites it 7× “11 U.S.C. § 552 (a) 6 allows the debtor to use, sell, or lease property such as new accounts receivable, in the ordinary course of business, without a court order.”
In Re Cross Baking Co., Inc., Debtor. New Hampshire Bus. Dev. Corp. v. Cross Baking Co., Inc., 818 F.2d 1027 (1st Cir. 1987). · cites it 4× “11 U.S.C. § 552 . Its purpose is to prevent a creditor’s pre-petition security interest in “after-acquired property” (a “floating lien”), such as NHBDC’s interest in Cross’ receivables, from attaching to property acquired by the estate or debtor-in-possession after the filing of…”
In the Matter of Chaseley's Foods, Inc., D/B/A Vic's Super Foods, Debtor. Appeal of Daniel L. Freeland, Tr., 726 F.2d 303 (7th Cir. 1984). · cites it 3× “” 11 U.S.C. § 552 (b). It is undisputed that the security agreement assigned to the Government covered Chaseley’s inventory and any proceeds arising from that inventory (Stipulation Agreement and Attachment B thereto).”
In re Nat'l Promoters & Servs., Inc., 499 B.R. 192 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2013). · cites it 8× “In regards to Island Holdings’ argument that the assignment of rents falls under 11 U.S.C. § 552 (b), the Debtor sustains that said section has certain exceptions, one of which is *197 Section 544, which provides for the avoidance of an unperfected security.”
— 11 U.S.C. § 552(a) — 1 case
Stalnaker v. Allison (In re Tri-State Fin., LLC), 526 B.R. 311 (Bankr. D. Neb. 2015).
— 11 U.S.C. § 552(b) — 4 cases
In Re Quality Interiors, Inc., 127 B.R. 391 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1991).
In Re Smith, 72 B.R. 344 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1987).
— 11 U.S.C. § 552(b)(2) — 1 case
In Re Amaravathi Ltd. P'ship, 416 B.R. 618 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2009).
— 11 U.S.C. § 552(d) — 1 case
In re Spurlock, 72 B.R. 392 (S.D.W. Va 1987).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.