Notwithstanding section 362 of this title, SIPC may file an application for a protective decree under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970. The filing of such application stays all proceedings in the case under this title unless and until such application is dismissed. If SIPC completes the liquidation of the debtor, then the court shall dismiss the case.
Notes of Decisions
Nicholas v. United States, 384 U.S. 678 (1966).
· cites it 2× “Bankruptcy Act §§ 342, 343, 11 U. S. C. §§ 742 , 743 (1964 ed.). But interest claimed on such a debt does not arise through a "delay" of the law in any meaningful sense.”
Dynamics Corp. of Am. v. Marine Midland Bank-New York, 505 N.E.2d 601 (N.Y. 1987).
“Where no trustee is appointed, as in a chapter XI proceeding, those claims reside in the debtor-in-possession, whose powers and responsibilities are in a sense akin to those of a trustee appointed by the bankruptcy court (see, Bankruptcy Act § 342, 11 USC § 742 [1976]; Stein v…”
Constructora Maza, Inc. v. Banco De Ponce, 616 F.2d 573 (1st Cir. 1980).
“Although Maza may not initially have intended its deposits to apply to offset its existing indebtedness to the Bank, the December 26 transaction in effect amounted to a repurchase of a certificate of deposit, limited by the pledge of that certificate to the Bank, having the…”
In re Copeland, 391 F. Supp. 134 (D. Del. 1975).
· cites it 2× “Bankruptcy Act § 342, 11 U.S.C. § 742 . In December 1970 the escrow agent, upon further demand, delivered the Christiana stock to Pension Benefit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.