12 U.S.C. § 86a
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28
cases, 1980–1994 · leading case: In Re Rexplore, Inc. Sec. Litig., 671 F. Supp. 679 (N.D. Cal. 1987).
In Re Rexplore, Inc. Sec. Litig., 671 F. Supp. 679 (N.D. Cal. 1987). “12 U.S.C. § 86a Title 12 U.S.C. § 86a prohibits charging interest on a commercial loan in excess of $1,000.”
Union Nat'l Bank of Laredo, Cross-Appellant v. Will M. Nelson, Cross-Appellee, 747 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1984). “” Union then filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that the usury ceilings of 12 U.S.C. § 86a, rather than Texas law ceilings, applied to the note.”
Medford v. Wholesale Elec. Supply Co., 691 S.W.2d 857 (Ark. 1985). “12 U.S.C. § 86a. We affirm. This Court has jurisdiction to decide cases involving usury.”
Brann v. Flagship Bank of Pinellas, NA, 450 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). “12 U.S.C. § 86a(a) (1980). See also Licata v.”
Winn v. Chateau Cantrell Apt. Co., 801 S.W.2d 261 (Ark. 1990). “The court also found that the transaction was not “a loan for business purposes” and thus the interest rate was not made legitimate by § 511 of the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980, 12 U.S.C.S. § 86a, which would have preempted the Arkansas…”
Nelson v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A., 794 F. Supp. 312 (D. Minnesota 1992). “” Defendants assert, however, that their meaning can be ascertained by reference to 12 U.S.C. § 86a. Congress enacted section 86a as part of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (DIDA) in March 1980.”
Boyles v. Smith, 759 P.2d 518 (Alaska 1988). “*521 12 U.S.C. § 86a (1982) (emphasis added). This federal statute preempts AS 45.”
Fox v. Peck Iron & Metal Co., Inc., 25 B.R. 674 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. 1982). “12 U.S.C. § 86a. 21 . The failure to state a maximum interest rate does not render an otherwise valid contract usurious.”
First Am. Bank v. Windjammer Time Sharing, 483 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). “1984), the court, in reference to 12 U.S.C. § 86a, stated: [t]he statute was enacted as part of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 as a temporary measure designed to aid banks in making business loans where their cost of funds was greater…”
Bilmar Drilling, Inc. v. Ifg Leasing Co., Bilmar Drilling, Inc. v. Ifg Leasing Co., 795 F.2d 1194 (5th Cir. 1986). “On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court determined that (1) the financing agreements represent a loan, not a lease, (2) the acceleration clause in the agreement is not usurious, (3) there was no intent to enter into a usurious contract, (4) IFG did not charge…”
Bank of New York v. Hoyt, 617 F. Supp. 1304 (D.R.I. 1985). “Section 511 is now codified at 12 U.S.C. § 86a (1980). 7 . In this vein, the reference to the prior discussion with Congressman Wylie is telling.”
Cornell & Co. v. Pace, 703 S.W.2d 398 (Tex. App. 1986). “The act, an amendment to the National Bank Act, was enacted 31 March 1980 to “apply only with respect to business or agricultural loans in amounts of $1,000 or more made in any State during the period beginning on April 1, 1980, and ending .”
— 12 U.S.C. § 86a(a) — 4 cases
Brann v. Flagship Bank of Pinellas, NA, 450 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). “12 U.S.C. § 86a(a) (1980). See also Licata v.”
United States v. M.L. McReynolds, 809 F.2d 1047 (5th Cir. 1986).
Union Nat'l Bank of Laredo, Cross-Appellant v. Will M. Nelson, Cross-Appellee, 747 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1984). “” Union then filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that the usury ceilings of 12 U.S.C. § 86a, rather than Texas law ceilings, applied to the note.”
Schemmel v. State Bank of Pennock, 408 N.W.2d 698 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
— 12 U.S.C. § 86a(a)(b) — 1 case
United Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Cage, 487 So. 2d 171 (La. Ct. App. 1986).
— 12 U.S.C. § 86a(b)(4) — 1 case
In re Skyland, Inc., 31 B.R. 920 (W.D. Mich. 1983).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.