15 U.S.C. § 1057

Certificates of registration

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Issuance and form

Certificates of registration of marks registered upon the principal register shall be issued in the name of the United States of America, under the seal of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and shall be signed by the Director or have his signature placed thereon, and a record thereof shall be kept in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The registration shall reproduce the mark, and state that the mark is registered on the principal register under this chapter, the date of the first use of the mark, the date of the first use of the mark in commerce, the particular goods or services for which it is registered, the number and date of the registration, the term thereof, the date on which the application for registration was received in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and any conditions and limitations that may be imposed in the registration.

(b) Certificate as prima facie evidence

A certificate of registration of a mark upon the principal register provided by this chapter shall be prima facie evidence of the validity of the registered mark and of the registration of the mark, of the owner’s ownership of the mark, and of the owner’s exclusive right to use the registered mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services specified in the certificate, subject to any conditions or limitations stated in the certificate.

(c) Application to register mark considered constructive useContingent on the registration of a mark on the principal register provided by this chapter, the filing of the application to register such mark shall constitute constructive use of the mark, conferring a right of priority, nationwide in effect, on or in connection with the goods or services specified in the registration against any other person except for a person whose mark has not been abandoned and who, prior to such filing—(1) has used the mark;(2) has filed an application to register the mark which is pending or has resulted in registration of the mark; or(3) has filed a foreign application to register the mark on the basis of which he or she has acquired a right of priority, and timely files an application under section 1126(d) of this title to register the mark which is pending or has resulted in registration of the mark.(d) Issuance to assignee

A certificate of registration of a mark may be issued to the assignee of the applicant, but the assignment must first be recorded in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. In case of change of ownership the Director shall, at the request of the owner and upon a proper showing and the payment of the prescribed fee, issue to such assignee a new certificate of registration of the said mark in the name of such assignee, and for the unexpired part of the original period.

(e) Surrender, cancellation, or amendment by owner

Upon application of the owner the Director may permit any registration to be surrendered for cancellation, and upon cancellation appropriate entry shall be made in the records of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Upon application of the owner and payment of the prescribed fee, the Director for good cause may permit any registration to be amended or to be disclaimed in part: Provided, That the amendment or disclaimer does not alter materially the character of the mark. Appropriate entry shall be made in the records of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and upon the certificate of registration.

(f) Copies of United States Patent and Trademark Office records as evidence

Copies of any records, books, papers, or drawings belonging to the United States Patent and Trademark Office relating to marks, and copies of registrations, when authenticated by the seal of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and certified by the Director, or in his name by an employee of the Office duly designated by the Director, shall be evidence in all cases wherein the originals would be evidence; and any person making application therefor and paying the prescribed fee shall have such copies.

(g) Correction of United States Patent and Trademark Office mistake

Whenever a material mistake in a registration, incurred through the fault of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, is clearly disclosed by the records of the Office a certificate stating the fact and nature of such mistake shall be issued without charge and recorded and a printed copy thereof shall be attached to each printed copy of the registration and such corrected registration shall thereafter have the same effect as if the same had been originally issued in such corrected form, or in the discretion of the Director a new certificate of registration may be issued without charge. All certificates of correction heretofore issued in accordance with the rules of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and the registrations to which they are attached shall have the same force and effect as if such certificates and their issue had been specifically authorized by statute.

(h) Correction of applicant’s mistake

Whenever a mistake has been made in a registration and a showing has been made that such mistake occurred in good faith through the fault of the applicant, the Director is authorized to issue a certificate of correction or, in his discretion, a new certificate upon the payment of the prescribed fee: Provided, That the correction does not involve such changes in the registration as to require republication of the mark.

(July 5, 1946, ch. 540, title I, § 7, 60 Stat. 430; Aug. 17, 1950, ch. 733, 64 Stat. 459; Pub. L. 87–772, § 4, Oct. 9, 1962, 76 Stat. 769; Pub. L. 93–596, § 1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 100–667, title I, § 109, Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3938; Pub. L. 105–330, title II, § 201(a)(3), Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 3070; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(b)(1)(B)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–583; Pub. L. 111–146, § 3(a), Mar. 17, 2010, 124 Stat. 66.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

Subsecs. (a) and (c) are from acts Feb. 20, 1905, ch. 592, § 11, 33 Stat. 727; Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 535, § 3, 43 Stat. 1269.

Subsec. (e) is from act Mar. 19, 1920, ch. 104, § 7, 41 Stat. 535.

Subsec. (f) is from act Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 535, § 1, 43 Stat. 1268.

Amendments

2010—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–146, § 3(a)(1), inserted “United States” before “Patent and Trademark Office” wherever appearing.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–146, § 3(a)(2), substituted “owner’s” for “registrant’s” in two places.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 111–146, § 3(a)(1), inserted “United States” before “Patent and Trademark Office”.

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 111–146, § 3(a)(1), (3), inserted “United States” before “Patent and Trademark Office” in two places, substituted “owner” for “registrant” in two places, and struck out “or, if said certificate is lost or destroyed, upon a certified copy thereof” after “certificate of registration”.

Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 111–146, § 3(a)(1), inserted “United States” before “Patent and Trademark Office” in two places.

Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 111–146, § 3(a)(4), amended subsec. (g) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “Whenever a material mistake in a registration, incurred through the fault of the Patent and Trademark Office, is clearly disclosed by the records of the Office a certificate stating the fact and nature of such mistake, shall be issued without charge and recorded and a printed copy thereof shall be attached to each printed copy of the registration certificate and such corrected registration shall thereafter have the same effect as if the same had been originally issued in such corrected form, or in the discretion of the Director a new certificate of registration may be issued without charge. All certificates of correction heretofore issued in accordance with the rules of the Patent and Trademark Office and the registrations to which they are attached shall have the same force and effect as if such certificates and their issue had been specifically authorized by statute.”

1999—Subsecs. (a), (d) to (h). Pub. L. 106–113 substituted “Director” for “Commissioner” wherever appearing.

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–330 struck out second period at end of first sentence.

1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–667, § 109(1), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: “A certificate of registration of a mark upon the principal register provided by this chapter shall be prima facie evidence of the validity of the registration, registrant’s ownership of the mark, and of registrant’s exclusive right to use the mark in commerce in connection with the goods or services specified in the certificate, subject to any conditions and limitations stated therein.”

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–667, § 109(3), added subsec. (c). Former subsec. (c) redesignated (d).

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 100–667, § 109(2), (4), redesignated former subsec. (c) as (d) and substituted “prescribed fee” for “fee herein provided”. Former subsec. (d) redesignated (e).

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 100–667, § 109(2), redesignated former subsec. (d) as (e). Former subsec. (e) redesignated (f).

Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 100–667, § 109(2), (5), redesignated former subsec. (e) as (f) and substituted “prescribed fee” for “fee required by law”. Former subsec. (f) redesignated (g).

Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 100–667, § 109(2), redesignated former subsec. (f) as (g). Former subsec. (g) redesignated (h).

Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 100–667, § 109(2), (6), redesignated former subsec. (g) as (h) and substituted “prescribed fee” for “required fee”.

1975—Subsecs. (a), (c) to (f). Pub. L. 93–596 substituted “Patent and Trademark Office” for “Patent Office”.

1962—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 87–772 substituted “signature placed” for “name printed”, and struck out provisions requiring an attestation by an assistant commissioner or by one of the law examiners designated by the Commissioner, together with printed copies of the drawing and statement of the applicant, to be kept in books for that purpose.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 87–772, among other charges, removed the requirement of a fee in connection with the voluntary surrender or cancellation of a registration.

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 87–772 substituted “an employee of the Office” for “a chief of division”, among other changes.

Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 87–772, among other changes, struck out “, signed by the Commissioner and sealed with the seal of the Patent Office” after “nature of such mistake”.

1950—Subsec. (a). Act Aug. 17, 1950, made it unnecessary to include in the certificate a statement of the applicant.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of Title 35, Patents.

Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–330 effective Oct. 30, 1998, and applicable only to any civil action filed or proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office commenced on or after such date relating to the registration of a mark, see section 201(b) of Pub. L. 105–330, set out as a note under section 1051 of this title.

Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–667 effective one year after Nov. 16, 1988, see section 136 of Pub. L. 100–667, set out as a note under section 1051 of this title.

Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of this title.

Repeal and Effect on Existing Rights

Repeal of inconsistent provisions, effect of this chapter on pending proceedings and existing registrations and rights under prior acts, see notes set out under section 1051 of this title.

Executive DocumentsTransfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of Commerce, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Commerce, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 5 of 1950, §§ 1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 680 cases (109 in the last 5 years), 1948–2026 · leading case: In Re: Cordua Restaurants, Inc., 823 F.3d 594 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re: Cordua Restaurants, Inc., 823 F.3d 594 (Fed. Cir. 2016). · cites it 4× “Cordua also argues that under § 7(b) of the Lanham Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 1057 (b)), registration on the Principal Register is prima facie evidence of a mark’s validity, even if the mark has not achieved incontestable status.”

CTB, Inc. v. Hog Slat, Inc., 954 F.3d 647 (4th Cir. 2020). · cites it 2× “See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1057 (b), 1115(a), 1125(a)(3); see also McAirlaids, 756 F.”

Lodestar Anstalt v. Bacardi & Co. Ltd., 31 F.4th 1228 (9th Cir. 2022). · cites it 3× “15 U.S.C. § 1057 (c) (emphasis added). By giving priority of right based on constructive use rather than actual use, the intent-to-use registration mechanism reflects, to that limited extent, a departure from trademark law’s traditional emphasis on priority of actual use.”

Novo Indus., L.P., Plaintiff-Cross v. Micro Molds Corp., & Oscar Helver, 350 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2003). · cites it 3× “Rather, the committee reports stated only that the additions were similar to trademark provisions then codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1057 (f)-(g). 4 S.Rep. No. 82-1979, at 27 (1952), reprinted in 1952 U.”

Zobmondo Ent., LLC v. Falls Media, LLC, 602 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 3× “15 U.S.C. §§ 1057 (b), 1115(a); KP Permanent Make-Up, 408 F.”

In RE:TAM en Banc, 808 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2015). · cites it 6× “Also, a registered mark is presumed to be valid, 15 U.S.C. § 1057 (b), and the mark becomes incontestable (with certain exceptions) after five years of consecutive post-registration use, id.”

B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc., 135 S. Ct. 1293 (2015). · cites it 2× “To the contrary: When registration is opposed, there is good reason to think that both sides will take the matter seriously.”

Amazing Spaces, Inc. v. Metro Mini Storage, 608 F.3d 225 (5th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “Lanham Act §§ 7(b) & 33(a), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1057 (b) & 1115(a); Elvis Presley Enters, v.”

Patsy's Italian Restaurant, Inc. v. Banas, 508 F. Supp. 2d 194 (E.D.N.Y 2007). · cites it 4× “See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1057 (b), 1115(a). Given the fact that plaintiffs’ marks have been federally registered since 2005, the court presumes they are valid.”

Dep't of Parks & Re-Creation for the State of California v. Bazaar Del Mundo Inc., a California Corp., 448 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2× “See 15 U.S.C. § 1057 (b); 15 U.S.C. § 1115 (a); Sengoku Works Ltd.”

All. for Good Gov't v. Coalition for Bett, 901 F.3d 498 (5th Cir. 2018). · cites it 2× “2010) ; 15 U.S.C. § 1057 (b) ). 10 To be sure, *508 Coalition could have offered evidence "to overcome the presumption of inherent distinctiveness that accompanies [Alliance's] registration[.”

Emergency One, Inc., D/B/A Am. Eagle Fire Apparatus Co., Inc. v. Am. Fire Eagle Engine Co., Inc., 332 F.3d 264 (4th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2× “” 15 U.S.C.A. § 1057 (b) (West 1997). Moreover, the presumption of priority enjoyed by the registrant of a mark is “nationwide in effect.”

Show all 680 citing cases →

— 15 U.S.C. § 1057(b) — 5 cases

Harrods Ltd. v. Sixty Internet Domain Names, 302 F.3d 214 (4th Cir. 2002).

George & Co. LLC v. Imagination Ent. Ltd., 575 F.3d 383 (4th Cir. 2009).

Lebewohl v. Heart Attack Grill LLC, 890 F. Supp. 2d 278 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).

In Re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1204 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

Union Carbide Corp. v. Ever-ready Inc., 392 F. Supp. 280 (N.D. Ill. 1975).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1057(c) — 1 case

Sound Surgical Tech., LLC v. Leonard A. Rubinstein, M.D., P.A., 734 F. Supp. 2d 1262 (M.D. Fla. 2010).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.